<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Salhotra A</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>292-299</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9129102</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>26(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Cyclophosphamide (Cy)/etoposide combined with fractionated total body irradiation (FTBI) or i.v. busulfan (Bu) has been the main conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for young patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) eligible for a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen. Recent data has suggested that i.v. Bu could be the preferred myeloablative regimen in patients with myeloid malignancies. However, Bu-based regimens are associated with higher rates of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Here we report long-term survival outcomes of patients with AML receiving FTBI combined with Cy or etoposide before undergoing alloHCT at City of Hope (COH). We obtained a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional registry of clinica</pubmed_abstract><journal>Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation</journal><pubmed_title>Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Treated with Myeloablative Fractionated Total Body Irradiation TBI-Based Conditioning with a Tacrolimus- and Sirolimus-Based Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis Regimen: 6-Year Follow-Up from a Single Center.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9129102</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 CA033572</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>Core</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Pullarkat V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Budde E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Snyder D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Spielberger R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mokhtari S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stein A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aribi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Teh JB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salhotra A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aldoss I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dandapani S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marcucci G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khaled S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ali H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hui S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dadwal S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Al Malki MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Forman SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Murata-Collins J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mei M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sandhu KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Armenian S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nakamura R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peng K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Treated with Myeloablative Fractionated Total Body Irradiation TBI-Based Conditioning with a Tacrolimus- and Sirolimus-Based Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis Regimen: 6-Year Follow-Up from a Single Center.</name><description>Cyclophosphamide (Cy)/etoposide combined with fractionated total body irradiation (FTBI) or i.v. busulfan (Bu) has been the main conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for young patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) eligible for a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen. Recent data has suggested that i.v. Bu could be the preferred myeloablative regimen in patients with myeloid malignancies. However, Bu-based regimens are associated with higher rates of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Here we report long-term survival outcomes of patients with AML receiving FTBI combined with Cy or etoposide before undergoing alloHCT at City of Hope (COH). We obtained a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional registry of clinica</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Feb</publication><modification>2025-05-31T23:33:32.042Z</modification><creation>2025-05-31T23:33:32.042Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9129102</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31536825</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.09.017</doi></cross_references></HashMap>