{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Yang B"],"funding":["National Natural Science Foundation of China"],"pagination":["167"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9137207"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["20(1)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objective</h4>The present study comparatively analyzed short-term clinical effectiveness and long-term follow-up endpoints associated with robotic-assisted sphincter-preserving surgery (RAS) and laparoscopic-assisted sphincter-preserving surgery (LAS) when used to treat low rectal cancer.<h4>Method</h4>Within such a single-center retrospective cohort analysis, low rectal cancer patients that underwent RAS (n=200) or LAS (n=486) between January 2015 and beginning of July 2018 were enrolled.<h4>Results</h4>The mean operative durations in the RAS and LAS cohorts were 249±64 min and 203±47 min, respectively (P<0.001). Temporary ileostomy rates in the RAS and LAS cohorts were 64.5% and 51.6% (P = 0.002). In addition, major variations across such cohorts regarding catheter removal timing, ti"],"journal":["World journal of surgical oncology"],"pubmed_title":["Analysis of bowel function, urogenital function, and long-term follow-up outcomes associated with robotic and laparoscopic sphincter-preserving surgical approaches to total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study."],"pmcid":["PMC9137207"],"funding_grant_id":["No.81874063"],"pubmed_authors":["Yang X","Li Y","Li D","Yang B","Zhang S","Wang Y","Zhao J"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Analysis of bowel function, urogenital function, and long-term follow-up outcomes associated with robotic and laparoscopic sphincter-preserving surgical approaches to total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.","description":"<h4>Objective</h4>The present study comparatively analyzed short-term clinical effectiveness and long-term follow-up endpoints associated with robotic-assisted sphincter-preserving surgery (RAS) and laparoscopic-assisted sphincter-preserving surgery (LAS) when used to treat low rectal cancer.<h4>Method</h4>Within such a single-center retrospective cohort analysis, low rectal cancer patients that underwent RAS (n=200) or LAS (n=486) between January 2015 and beginning of July 2018 were enrolled.<h4>Results</h4>The mean operative durations in the RAS and LAS cohorts were 249±64 min and 203±47 min, respectively (P<0.001). Temporary ileostomy rates in the RAS and LAS cohorts were 64.5% and 51.6% (P = 0.002). In addition, major variations across such cohorts regarding catheter removal timing, ti","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 May","modification":"2025-04-19T22:14:22.365Z","creation":"2024-11-19T21:07:49.815Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9137207","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35624511"],"doi":["10.1186/s12957-022-02631-0"]}}