<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12</volume><submitter>Raphael A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The use of CGP in guiding treatment decisions in aNSCLC with acquired resistance to ALK TKIs is questionable.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We prospectively assessed the impact of CGP on the decision-making process in ALK-rearranged aNSCLC patients following progression on 2&lt;sup>nd&lt;/sup>/3&lt;sup>rd&lt;/sup>-generation ALK TKIs. Physician's choice of the most recommended next-line systemic treatment (NLST) was captured before and after receival of CGP results; the percentage of cases in which the NLST recommendation has changed was assessed along with the CGP turnaround time (TAT). Patients were divided into groups: patients in whom the NLST was initiated after (group 1) and before (group 2) receival of the CGP results. Time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) with N</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in oncology</journal><pagination>874712</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9137396</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The Impact of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) on the Decision-Making Process in the Treatment of ALK-Rearranged Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (aNSCLC) After Failure of 2&lt;sup>nd&lt;/sup>/3&lt;sup>rd&lt;/sup>-Generation ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs).</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9137396</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Peled N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dudnik J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zer A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cohen AY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dudnik E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moskovitz M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kian W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bar J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shochat T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Agbarya A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raphael A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oedegaard C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grynberg S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Holtzman L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Urban D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Onn A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rabinovich NM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Impact of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) on the Decision-Making Process in the Treatment of ALK-Rearranged Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (aNSCLC) After Failure of 2&lt;sup>nd&lt;/sup>/3&lt;sup>rd&lt;/sup>-Generation ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs).</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The use of CGP in guiding treatment decisions in aNSCLC with acquired resistance to ALK TKIs is questionable.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We prospectively assessed the impact of CGP on the decision-making process in ALK-rearranged aNSCLC patients following progression on 2&lt;sup>nd&lt;/sup>/3&lt;sup>rd&lt;/sup>-generation ALK TKIs. Physician's choice of the most recommended next-line systemic treatment (NLST) was captured before and after receival of CGP results; the percentage of cases in which the NLST recommendation has changed was assessed along with the CGP turnaround time (TAT). Patients were divided into groups: patients in whom the NLST was initiated after (group 1) and before (group 2) receival of the CGP results. Time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) with N</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-05-29T14:36:28.506Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T02:16:19.474Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9137396</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35646707</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fonc.2022.874712</doi></cross_references></HashMap>