<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Rousseau B</submitter><funding>Centre de Ressources Biologiques du Centre Léon Bérard</funding><funding>Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology NCI Cancer Center Core</funding><funding>Integrated Cancer Research Site LYriCAN</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIH</funding><funding>PLASCAN</funding><pagination>1435-1448</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9167784</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Missense mutations in the polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene have been reported to generate proofreading defects resulting in an ultramutated genome and to sensitize tumors to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. However, many POLE-mutated tumors do not respond to such treatment. To better understand the link between POLE mutation variants and response to immunotherapy, we prospectively assessed the efficacy of nivolumab in a multicenter clinical trial in patients bearing advanced mismatch repair-proficient POLE-mutated solid tumors. We found that only tumors harboring selective POLE pathogenic mutations in the DNA binding or catalytic site of the exonuclease domain presented high mutational burden with a specific single-base substitution signature, high T-cell infiltrates, and a high response r</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cancer discovery</journal><pubmed_title>PD-1 Blockade in Solid Tumors with Defects in Polymerase Epsilon.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9167784</pmcid><funding_grant_id>T32-CA009512</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>INCa-DGOS-Inserm_12563</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 CA009512</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA008748</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30-CA008748</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>#BB-0033-00050</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>17-CONV-0002</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Gomez-Roca C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pouessel D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lamrani-Ghaouti A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de la Fouchardiere C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bouche O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Svrcek M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oudard S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stephens D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lamendola-Essel MF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cercek A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoog-Labouret N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Segal NH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krishnan AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rousseau B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guimbaud R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Champiat S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simmet V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Legrand F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marabelle A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diplas BH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pasmant E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cousin S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grob JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Argiles G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Reynies A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hollebecque A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Andre T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gerber DG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rolland F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tabone-Eglinger S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pannier D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guillet M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Flechon A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bieche I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferrari A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diaz LA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chevret S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Soria JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Malka D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tournigand C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Foote MB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leulliot N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El Hajbi F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Masliah-Planchon J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Duluc M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cohen R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Attignon V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Augereau P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Michon L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hiret S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saada-Bouzid E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamzaoui N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saintigny P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bruyas A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maron SB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simon C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>PD-1 Blockade in Solid Tumors with Defects in Polymerase Epsilon.</name><description>Missense mutations in the polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene have been reported to generate proofreading defects resulting in an ultramutated genome and to sensitize tumors to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. However, many POLE-mutated tumors do not respond to such treatment. To better understand the link between POLE mutation variants and response to immunotherapy, we prospectively assessed the efficacy of nivolumab in a multicenter clinical trial in patients bearing advanced mismatch repair-proficient POLE-mutated solid tumors. We found that only tumors harboring selective POLE pathogenic mutations in the DNA binding or catalytic site of the exonuclease domain presented high mutational burden with a specific single-base substitution signature, high T-cell infiltrates, and a high response r</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jun</publication><modification>2026-05-09T19:30:18.169Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T22:50:01.19Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9167784</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35398880</pubmed><doi>10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0521</doi><doi>10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0521</doi></cross_references></HashMap>