<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Shaw RH</submitter><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><pagination>1049-1060</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9179150</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(11)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Priming COVID-19 vaccine schedules have been deployed at variable intervals globally, which might influence immune persistence and the relative importance of third-dose booster programmes. Here, we report exploratory analyses from the Com-COV trial, assessing the effect of 4-week versus 12-week priming intervals on reactogenicity and the persistence of immune response up to 6 months after homologous and heterologous priming schedules using the vaccines BNT162b2 (tozinameran, Pfizer/BioNTech) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Com-COV was a participant-masked, randomised immunogenicity trial. For these exploratory analyses, we used the trial's general cohort, in which adults aged 50 years or older were randomly assigned to four homologous and four heterolog</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Lancet. Respiratory medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Effect of priming interval on reactogenicity, peak immunological response, and waning after homologous and heterologous COVID-19 vaccine schedules: exploratory analyses of Com-COV, a randomised control trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9179150</pmcid><funding_grant_id>MR/N013204/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NF-SI-0617-10010</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NIHR201409</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MR/N026993/1</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Ferreira DM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nguyen-Van-Tam JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walker LL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yao XL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Warren S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rampling T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Howe EG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mujadidi YF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Turner PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Okenyi E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heath PT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Charlton S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hultin C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ricamara M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown CH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maelin F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bula M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clutterbuck EA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singh N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lazarus R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hughes E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Com-COV Study Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hill H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bartholomew J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yee Ting NY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shaw RH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lambe T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Presland L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Royal S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Finn A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>San Francisco Ramos A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Screaton GR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Green CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Naker K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ramasamy MN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Noristani R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Andrews NJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Libri V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Varkonyi-Clifford S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saich S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Qureshi E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Desai A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Belton S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Provstgaard-Morys S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Horswill S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kellett Wright JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fyles F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Faust SN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Whittley S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greenland M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oldfield NJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Long F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carson A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dejnirattisai W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ramsay M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Read RC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Burhan H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Maso C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cameron JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>White R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Snape MD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galiza EP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Crook R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hammersley D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Turner N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hallis B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Plested EL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dinesh T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Collins AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mead G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stuart ASV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Robinson H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riaz T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Munro APS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ghulam Farooq M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Turner DPJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adams K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gokani K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morey ER</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vichos I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williams RL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aley PK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Penciu FD</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effect of priming interval on reactogenicity, peak immunological response, and waning after homologous and heterologous COVID-19 vaccine schedules: exploratory analyses of Com-COV, a randomised control trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Priming COVID-19 vaccine schedules have been deployed at variable intervals globally, which might influence immune persistence and the relative importance of third-dose booster programmes. Here, we report exploratory analyses from the Com-COV trial, assessing the effect of 4-week versus 12-week priming intervals on reactogenicity and the persistence of immune response up to 6 months after homologous and heterologous priming schedules using the vaccines BNT162b2 (tozinameran, Pfizer/BioNTech) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Com-COV was a participant-masked, randomised immunogenicity trial. For these exploratory analyses, we used the trial's general cohort, in which adults aged 50 years or older were randomly assigned to four homologous and four heterolog</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2026-05-09T15:11:56.052Z</modification><creation>2024-10-15T13:35:11.769Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9179150</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35690076</pubmed><doi>10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00163-1</doi></cross_references></HashMap>