<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Kammer-Kerwick M</submitter><funding>Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation</funding><funding>William E. and Josephine B. Buchanan Family Foundation</funding><pagination>3023-3047</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9213640</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>17(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>We analyze survey data from 5,487 residents of 85 Texas communities, including rural communities, small towns, medium-sized cities, and the five largest urban centers, to model the influence of the degree of urbanity and rurality of a community as well as residents' social position, values, and their satisfaction with local assets. The paper's central argument is that a wide range of factors impact how community members think about their needs and thus should be considered in any community development process. This human-centered approach looks at how community specific factors impact economic and quality-of-life development project preferences in support of adapting community development decision-making processes according to the context of each community. For the sake of parsimony, this </pubmed_abstract><journal>Applied research in quality of life</journal><pubmed_title>Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9213640</pmcid><funding_grant_id>Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>William E. and Josephine B. Buchanan Family Foundation</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kellison JB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kammer-Kerwick M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Takasaki K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sternberg J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities.</name><description>We analyze survey data from 5,487 residents of 85 Texas communities, including rural communities, small towns, medium-sized cities, and the five largest urban centers, to model the influence of the degree of urbanity and rurality of a community as well as residents' social position, values, and their satisfaction with local assets. The paper's central argument is that a wide range of factors impact how community members think about their needs and thus should be considered in any community development process. This human-centered approach looks at how community specific factors impact economic and quality-of-life development project preferences in support of adapting community development decision-making processes according to the context of each community. For the sake of parsimony, this </description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-04T03:06:17.914Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T05:06:17.157Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9213640</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35756429</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s11482-022-10051-1</doi></cross_references></HashMap>