<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(26)</volume><submitter>Li X</submitter><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pubmed_abstract>In 1953, Pauling and Corey postulated "rippled" β-sheets, composed of a mixture of d- and l-peptide strands, as a hypothetical alternative to the now well-established structures of "pleated" β-sheets, which they proposed as a component of all-l-proteins. Growing interest in rippled β-sheets over the past decade has led to the development of mixtures of d- and l-peptides for biomedical applications, and a theory has emerged that mixtures of enantiomeric β-sheet peptides prefer to co-assemble in a heterochiral fashion to form rippled β-sheets. Intrigued by conflicting reports that enantiomeric β-sheet peptides prefer to self-assemble in a homochiral fashion to form pleated β-sheets, we set out address this controversy using two β-sheet peptides derived from Aβ&lt;sub>17-23&lt;/sub> and Aβ&lt;sub>30-36&lt;/sub>, peptides 1a and 1b. Each of these peptides self-assembles to form tetramers comprising sandwiches of β-sheet dimers in aqueous solution. Through solution-phase NMR spectroscopy, we characterize the different species formed when peptides 1a and 1b are mixed with their respective d-enantiomers, peptides &lt;i>ent&lt;/i>-1a and &lt;i>ent&lt;/i>-1b. &lt;sup>1&lt;/sup>H NMR, DOSY, and &lt;sup>1&lt;/sup>H,&lt;sup>15&lt;/sup>N-HSQC experiments reveal that mixing peptides 1a and &lt;i>ent&lt;/i>-1a results in the predominant formation of homochiral tetramers, with a smaller fraction of a new heterochiral tetramer, and mixing peptides 1b and &lt;i>ent&lt;/i>-1b does not result in any detectable heterochiral assembly. &lt;sup>15&lt;/sup>N-edited NOESY reveals that the heterochiral tetramer formed by peptides 1a and &lt;i>ent&lt;/i>-1a is composed of two homochiral dimers. Collectively, these NMR studies of Aβ-derived peptides provide compelling evidence that enantiomeric β-sheet peptides prefer to self-assemble in a homochiral fashion in aqueous solution.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Chemical science</journal><pagination>7739-7746</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9258340</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Enantiomeric β-sheet peptides from Aβ form homochiral pleated β-sheets rather than heterochiral rippled β-sheets.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9258340</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Li X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rios SE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nowick JS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Enantiomeric β-sheet peptides from Aβ form homochiral pleated β-sheets rather than heterochiral rippled β-sheets.</name><description>In 1953, Pauling and Corey postulated "rippled" β-sheets, composed of a mixture of d- and l-peptide strands, as a hypothetical alternative to the now well-established structures of "pleated" β-sheets, which they proposed as a component of all-l-proteins. Growing interest in rippled β-sheets over the past decade has led to the development of mixtures of d- and l-peptides for biomedical applications, and a theory has emerged that mixtures of enantiomeric β-sheet peptides prefer to co-assemble in a heterochiral fashion to form rippled β-sheets. Intrigued by conflicting reports that enantiomeric β-sheet peptides prefer to self-assemble in a homochiral fashion to form pleated β-sheets, we set out address this controversy using two β-sheet peptides derived from Aβ&lt;sub>17-23&lt;/sub> and Aβ&lt;sub>30-36&lt;/sub>, peptides 1a and 1b. Each of these peptides self-assembles to form tetramers comprising sandwiches of β-sheet dimers in aqueous solution. Through solution-phase NMR spectroscopy, we characterize the different species formed when peptides 1a and 1b are mixed with their respective d-enantiomers, peptides &lt;i>ent&lt;/i>-1a and &lt;i>ent&lt;/i>-1b. &lt;sup>1&lt;/sup>H NMR, DOSY, and &lt;sup>1&lt;/sup>H,&lt;sup>15&lt;/sup>N-HSQC experiments reveal that mixing peptides 1a and &lt;i>ent&lt;/i>-1a results in the predominant formation of homochiral tetramers, with a smaller fraction of a new heterochiral tetramer, and mixing peptides 1b and &lt;i>ent&lt;/i>-1b does not result in any detectable heterochiral assembly. &lt;sup>15&lt;/sup>N-edited NOESY reveals that the heterochiral tetramer formed by peptides 1a and &lt;i>ent&lt;/i>-1a is composed of two homochiral dimers. Collectively, these NMR studies of Aβ-derived peptides provide compelling evidence that enantiomeric β-sheet peptides prefer to self-assemble in a homochiral fashion in aqueous solution.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jul</publication><modification>2025-04-05T14:26:09.741Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T14:26:09.741Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9258340</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35865901</pubmed><doi>10.1039/d2sc02080g</doi></cross_references></HashMap>