<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(12)</volume><submitter>Chen L</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>To explore the optimum induction therapy for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible but have not yet received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in China.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A total of 140 NDMM patients with cytogenetic background were selected from the Chang Zheng Hospital for this study. The induction therapy consisted of combined bortezomib (1.3 mg/m&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, i.v.), cyclophosphamide (200 mg, i.v.), and dexamethasone (20 mg, i.v.) (VCD); or combined bortezomib (1.3 mg/m&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, i.v.), epirubicin (50 mg/m&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, i.v.), and dexamethasone (20 mg, i.v.) (PAD). All patients received 4-6 cycles of induction therapy until the first remission (defined as reaching at least partial remission), followed by thalidomide (100 mg/ev</pubmed_abstract><journal>Annals of translational medicine</journal><pagination>674</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9279781</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Bortezomib, epirubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD) results in superior free-progression survival compared to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCD) treatment in non-transplantation newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients aged between 50 to 65: a retrospective single-center analysis in non-transplant patients.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9279781</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Yi K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jin S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fu W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xian H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mou X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lan H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Bortezomib, epirubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD) results in superior free-progression survival compared to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCD) treatment in non-transplantation newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients aged between 50 to 65: a retrospective single-center analysis in non-transplant patients.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>To explore the optimum induction therapy for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible but have not yet received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in China.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A total of 140 NDMM patients with cytogenetic background were selected from the Chang Zheng Hospital for this study. The induction therapy consisted of combined bortezomib (1.3 mg/m&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, i.v.), cyclophosphamide (200 mg, i.v.), and dexamethasone (20 mg, i.v.) (VCD); or combined bortezomib (1.3 mg/m&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, i.v.), epirubicin (50 mg/m&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, i.v.), and dexamethasone (20 mg, i.v.) (PAD). All patients received 4-6 cycles of induction therapy until the first remission (defined as reaching at least partial remission), followed by thalidomide (100 mg/ev</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-27T03:14:30.757Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T18:49:37.453Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9279781</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35845500</pubmed><doi>10.21037/atm-22-394</doi></cross_references></HashMap>