<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Roos M</submitter><funding>Swiss National Science Foundation</funding><pagination>1555-1574</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9292837</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>63(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>In recent years, Bayesian meta-analysis expressed by a normal-normal hierarchical model (NNHM) has been widely used for combining evidence from multiple studies. Data provided for the NNHM are frequently based on a small number of studies and on uncertain within-study standard deviation values. Despite the widespread use of Bayesian NNHM, it has always been unclear to what extent the posterior inference is impacted by the heterogeneity prior (sensitivity S ) and by the uncertainty in the within-study standard deviation values (identification I ). Thus, to answer this question, we developed a unified method to simultaneously quantify both sensitivity and identification ( S - I ) for all model parameters in a Bayesian NNHM, based on derivatives of the Bhattacharyya coefficient with respect t</pubmed_abstract><journal>Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift</journal><pubmed_title>Sensitivity and identification quantification by a relative latent model complexity perturbation in Bayesian meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9292837</pmcid><funding_grant_id>175933</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Rue H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roos M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hunanyan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bakka H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Sensitivity and identification quantification by a relative latent model complexity perturbation in Bayesian meta-analysis.</name><description>In recent years, Bayesian meta-analysis expressed by a normal-normal hierarchical model (NNHM) has been widely used for combining evidence from multiple studies. Data provided for the NNHM are frequently based on a small number of studies and on uncertain within-study standard deviation values. Despite the widespread use of Bayesian NNHM, it has always been unclear to what extent the posterior inference is impacted by the heterogeneity prior (sensitivity S ) and by the uncertainty in the within-study standard deviation values (identification I ). Thus, to answer this question, we developed a unified method to simultaneously quantify both sensitivity and identification ( S - I ) for all model parameters in a Bayesian NNHM, based on derivatives of the Bhattacharyya coefficient with respect t</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-25T21:51:01.259Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T04:57:15.977Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9292837</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34378223</pubmed><doi>10.1002/bimj.202000193</doi></cross_references></HashMap>