<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12</volume><submitter>Zhang Y</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background and aims&lt;/h4>Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a well-known risk factor for poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to develop a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to predict MVI, and thus to predict prognosis in patients with HCC.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A total of 436 patients with surgically resected HCC who underwent preoperative CEUS were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into training (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 301), validation (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 102), and test (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 33) sets. A clinical model (Clinical model), a CEUS video-based DCNN model (CEUS-DCNN model), and a fusion model based on CEUS video and clinical variables (CECL-DCNN model) were built to predict MVI. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the clinical performance of the predicted MVI.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Compared with the Clinical model, the CEUS-DCNN model exhibited similar sensitivity, but higher specificity (71.4% vs. 38.1%, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.03) in the test group. The CECL-DCNN model showed significantly higher specificity (81.0% vs. 38.1%, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.005) and accuracy (78.8% vs. 51.5%, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.009) than the Clinical model, with an AUC of 0.865. The Clinical predicted MVI could not significantly distinguish OS or RFS (both &lt;i>p&lt;/i> > 0.05), while the CEUS-DCNN predicted MVI could only predict the earlier recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence interval [CI 2.92 [1.1-7.75], &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.024). However, the CECL-DCNN predicted MVI was a significant prognostic factor for both OS (HR with 95% CI: 6.03 [1.7-21.39], &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.009) and RFS (HR with 95% CI: 3.3 [1.23-8.91], &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.011) in the test group.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The proposed CECL-DCNN model based on preoperative CEUS video can serve as a noninvasive tool to predict MVI status in HCC, thereby predicting poor prognosis.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in oncology</journal><pagination>878061</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9300962</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Deep Learning of Liver Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Predict Microvascular Invasion and Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9300962</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Cao L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liao Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mao R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zou X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yao Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wei Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yan C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Han J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lin M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Deep Learning of Liver Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Predict Microvascular Invasion and Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background and aims&lt;/h4>Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a well-known risk factor for poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to develop a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to predict MVI, and thus to predict prognosis in patients with HCC.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A total of 436 patients with surgically resected HCC who underwent preoperative CEUS were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into training (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 301), validation (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 102), and test (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 33) sets. A clinical model (Clinical model), a CEUS video-based DCNN model (CEUS-DCNN model), and a fusion model based on CEUS video and clinical variables (CECL-DCNN model) were built to predict MVI. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the clinical performance of the predicted MVI.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Compared with the Clinical model, the CEUS-DCNN model exhibited similar sensitivity, but higher specificity (71.4% vs. 38.1%, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.03) in the test group. The CECL-DCNN model showed significantly higher specificity (81.0% vs. 38.1%, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.005) and accuracy (78.8% vs. 51.5%, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.009) than the Clinical model, with an AUC of 0.865. The Clinical predicted MVI could not significantly distinguish OS or RFS (both &lt;i>p&lt;/i> > 0.05), while the CEUS-DCNN predicted MVI could only predict the earlier recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence interval [CI 2.92 [1.1-7.75], &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.024). However, the CECL-DCNN predicted MVI was a significant prognostic factor for both OS (HR with 95% CI: 6.03 [1.7-21.39], &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.009) and RFS (HR with 95% CI: 3.3 [1.23-8.91], &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.011) in the test group.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The proposed CECL-DCNN model based on preoperative CEUS video can serve as a noninvasive tool to predict MVI status in HCC, thereby predicting poor prognosis.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-25T19:44:52.999Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T08:07:40.303Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9300962</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35875110</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fonc.2022.878061</doi></cross_references></HashMap>