<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>129(7)</volume><submitter>Diedrich CM</submitter><funding>Tepha, Inc., Lexington, MA, USA</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate the host- and biomechanical response to a fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold in comparison with the response to polypropylene (PP) mesh.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>In vivo animal experiment.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>KU Leuven Center for Surgical Technologies.&lt;h4>Population&lt;/h4>Fourteen parous female Mule sheep.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>P4HB scaffolds were surgically implanted in the posterior vaginal wall of sheep. The comparative PP mesh data were obtained from an identical study protocol performed previously.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>Gross necropsy, host response and biomechanical evaluation of explants, and the in vivo P4HB scaffold degradation were evaluated at 60- and 180-days post-implantation. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SEM).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Gross necropsy revealed no implant-related adverse events using P4HB scaffolds. The tensile stiffness of the P4HB explants increased at 180-days (12.498 ± 2.66 N/mm SEM [p =0.019]) as compared to 60-days (4.585 ± 1.57 N/mm) post-implantation, while P4HB degraded gradually. P4HB scaffolds exhibited excellent tissue integration with dense connective tissue and a moderate initial host response. P4HB scaffolds induced a significantly higher M2/M1 ratio (1.70 ± 0.67 SD, score 0-4), as compared to PP mesh(0.99 ± 0.78 SD, score 0-4) at 180-days.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>P4HB scaffold facilitated a gradual load transfer to vaginal tissue over time. The fully absorbable P4HB scaffold, in comparison to PP mesh, has a favorable host response with comparable load-bearing capacity. If these results are also observed at longer follow-up in-vivo, a clinical study using P4HB for vaginal POP surgery may be warranted to demonstrate efficacy.&lt;h4>Tweetable abstract&lt;/h4>Degradable vaginal P4HB implant might be a solution for treatment of POP.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</journal><pagination>1039-1049</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9303173</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Evaluation of the short-term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9303173</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Diedrich CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hympanova L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deprest J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guler Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mazza E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vodegel E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roovers JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zundel M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Evaluation of the short-term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate the host- and biomechanical response to a fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold in comparison with the response to polypropylene (PP) mesh.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>In vivo animal experiment.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>KU Leuven Center for Surgical Technologies.&lt;h4>Population&lt;/h4>Fourteen parous female Mule sheep.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>P4HB scaffolds were surgically implanted in the posterior vaginal wall of sheep. The comparative PP mesh data were obtained from an identical study protocol performed previously.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>Gross necropsy, host response and biomechanical evaluation of explants, and the in vivo P4HB scaffold degradation were evaluated at 60- and 180-days post-implantation. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SEM).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Gross necropsy revealed no implant-related adverse events using P4HB scaffolds. The tensile stiffness of the P4HB explants increased at 180-days (12.498 ± 2.66 N/mm SEM [p =0.019]) as compared to 60-days (4.585 ± 1.57 N/mm) post-implantation, while P4HB degraded gradually. P4HB scaffolds exhibited excellent tissue integration with dense connective tissue and a moderate initial host response. P4HB scaffolds induced a significantly higher M2/M1 ratio (1.70 ± 0.67 SD, score 0-4), as compared to PP mesh(0.99 ± 0.78 SD, score 0-4) at 180-days.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>P4HB scaffold facilitated a gradual load transfer to vaginal tissue over time. The fully absorbable P4HB scaffold, in comparison to PP mesh, has a favorable host response with comparable load-bearing capacity. If these results are also observed at longer follow-up in-vivo, a clinical study using P4HB for vaginal POP surgery may be warranted to demonstrate efficacy.&lt;h4>Tweetable abstract&lt;/h4>Degradable vaginal P4HB implant might be a solution for treatment of POP.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-22T05:58:51.963Z</modification><creation>2022-08-08T22:18:53.97Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9303173</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34865300</pubmed><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.17040</doi></cross_references></HashMap>