<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>1511(1)</volume><submitter>Kallab M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>We compare the focal structure-function correlation of structural measurements of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL-T) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), capillary density (CD) measurements using OCT-angiography (OCT-A), or a combination of both, with visual field deviation (VFD) in early to advanced glaucoma. Primary open angle glaucoma patients (n = 46, mean ± SD age: 67 ± 10 years; VF mean deviation: -10.41 ± 6.76 dB) were included in this cross-sectional study. We performed 30-2 standard automated perimetry OCT (3.5-mm diameter ring scan) and 15°×15° OCT-A (superficial vascular complex slab). Based on a nerve fiber trajectory model, each VF test spot was assigned to an OCT-A wedge and an OCT ring-sector. Two univariate linear models (M&lt;sub>v&lt;/sub> and M&lt;sub>t&lt;/sub> ) using either CD-based vascular (M&lt;sub>v&lt;/sub> ) or RNFL-T-based thickness information (M&lt;sub>t&lt;/sub> ) and one multivariate model using both (M&lt;sub>v:t&lt;/sub> ) were compared in their associations with measured focal VFD, which were higher for the multivariate model M&lt;sub>v:t&lt;/sub> (mean ± SD correlation coefficient: 0.710 ± 0.086) than for either nested model (0.627 ± 0.078 for M&lt;sub>v&lt;/sub> and 0.578 ± 0.095 for M&lt;sub>t&lt;/sub> ). Using a focal visual field approach, the combination of RNFL-T and CD showed better structure-function correlations than thickness or vascular information only.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</journal><pagination>133-141</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9305098</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Combining vascular and nerve fiber layer thickness measurements to model glaucomatous focal visual field loss.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9305098</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Schmetterer L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schlatter A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schmidl D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hommer N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hirn C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garhofer G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kallab M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Findl O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tan B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chua J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Combining vascular and nerve fiber layer thickness measurements to model glaucomatous focal visual field loss.</name><description>We compare the focal structure-function correlation of structural measurements of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL-T) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), capillary density (CD) measurements using OCT-angiography (OCT-A), or a combination of both, with visual field deviation (VFD) in early to advanced glaucoma. Primary open angle glaucoma patients (n = 46, mean ± SD age: 67 ± 10 years; VF mean deviation: -10.41 ± 6.76 dB) were included in this cross-sectional study. We performed 30-2 standard automated perimetry OCT (3.5-mm diameter ring scan) and 15°×15° OCT-A (superficial vascular complex slab). Based on a nerve fiber trajectory model, each VF test spot was assigned to an OCT-A wedge and an OCT ring-sector. Two univariate linear models (M&lt;sub>v&lt;/sub> and M&lt;sub>t&lt;/sub> ) using either CD-based vascular (M&lt;sub>v&lt;/sub> ) or RNFL-T-based thickness information (M&lt;sub>t&lt;/sub> ) and one multivariate model using both (M&lt;sub>v:t&lt;/sub> ) were compared in their associations with measured focal VFD, which were higher for the multivariate model M&lt;sub>v:t&lt;/sub> (mean ± SD correlation coefficient: 0.710 ± 0.086) than for either nested model (0.627 ± 0.078 for M&lt;sub>v&lt;/sub> and 0.578 ± 0.095 for M&lt;sub>t&lt;/sub> ). Using a focal visual field approach, the combination of RNFL-T and CD showed better structure-function correlations than thickness or vascular information only.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 May</publication><modification>2025-04-26T13:00:53.306Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T04:38:19.066Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9305098</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35029314</pubmed><doi>10.1111/nyas.14732</doi></cross_references></HashMap>