{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["12(7)"],"submitter":["An E"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Introduction</h4>Evaluating the quality of dying and death is essential to ensure high-quality end-of-life care. The Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) scale is the best-validated measure of the construct, but many items are not relevant to participants, particularly in low-resource settings. The aim of this multisite cross-sectional study is to develop and validate the QODD-Revised Global Version (QODD-RGV), to enhance ease of completion and relevance in higher-resource and lower-resource settings.<h4>Methods and analysis</h4>This study will be a two-arm, multisite evaluation of the cultural relevance, reliability and validity of the QODD-RGV across four participating North American hospices and a palliative care site in Malawi, Africa. Bereaved caregivers and healthcare providers of p"],"journal":["BMJ open"],"pagination":["e064508"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9328109"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Protocol for the development and multisite validation of the Quality of Dying and Death-Revised Global Version scale."],"pmcid":["PMC9328109"],"pubmed_authors":["Ntizimira C","Zimmermann C","Chandrakumar M","Thambo L","Wolofsky K","Rodin G","Lewin W","Namisango E","An E","Chikasema M","Mah K","Tilly A","Baguio A","Goombs M","Jaffer N","Hales S"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Protocol for the development and multisite validation of the Quality of Dying and Death-Revised Global Version scale.","description":"<h4>Introduction</h4>Evaluating the quality of dying and death is essential to ensure high-quality end-of-life care. The Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) scale is the best-validated measure of the construct, but many items are not relevant to participants, particularly in low-resource settings. The aim of this multisite cross-sectional study is to develop and validate the QODD-Revised Global Version (QODD-RGV), to enhance ease of completion and relevance in higher-resource and lower-resource settings.<h4>Methods and analysis</h4>This study will be a two-arm, multisite evaluation of the cultural relevance, reliability and validity of the QODD-RGV across four participating North American hospices and a palliative care site in Malawi, Africa. Bereaved caregivers and healthcare providers of p","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Jul","modification":"2025-04-21T22:34:45.743Z","creation":"2025-04-05T18:49:02.299Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9328109","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35879006"],"doi":["10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064508"]}}