<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(7)</volume><submitter>An E</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Evaluating the quality of dying and death is essential to ensure high-quality end-of-life care. The Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) scale is the best-validated measure of the construct, but many items are not relevant to participants, particularly in low-resource settings. The aim of this multisite cross-sectional study is to develop and validate the QODD-Revised Global Version (QODD-RGV), to enhance ease of completion and relevance in higher-resource and lower-resource settings.&lt;h4>Methods and analysis&lt;/h4>This study will be a two-arm, multisite evaluation of the cultural relevance, reliability and validity of the QODD-RGV across four participating North American hospices and a palliative care site in Malawi, Africa. Bereaved caregivers and healthcare providers of p</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pagination>e064508</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9328109</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Protocol for the development and multisite validation of the Quality of Dying and Death-Revised Global Version scale.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9328109</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ntizimira C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zimmermann C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chandrakumar M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thambo L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wolofsky K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rodin G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lewin W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Namisango E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>An E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chikasema M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mah K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tilly A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baguio A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goombs M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jaffer N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hales S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Protocol for the development and multisite validation of the Quality of Dying and Death-Revised Global Version scale.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Evaluating the quality of dying and death is essential to ensure high-quality end-of-life care. The Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) scale is the best-validated measure of the construct, but many items are not relevant to participants, particularly in low-resource settings. The aim of this multisite cross-sectional study is to develop and validate the QODD-Revised Global Version (QODD-RGV), to enhance ease of completion and relevance in higher-resource and lower-resource settings.&lt;h4>Methods and analysis&lt;/h4>This study will be a two-arm, multisite evaluation of the cultural relevance, reliability and validity of the QODD-RGV across four participating North American hospices and a palliative care site in Malawi, Africa. Bereaved caregivers and healthcare providers of p</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jul</publication><modification>2025-04-21T22:34:45.743Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T18:49:02.299Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9328109</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35879006</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064508</doi></cross_references></HashMap>