<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>59(6)</volume><submitter>van Limburg Stirum EVJ</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate the effect of cervical pessary, as a strategy to prevent preterm birth (PTB), on the outcome of subsequent pregnancy and maternal quality of life 4 years after the index twin pregnancy.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between 2009 and 2012, the ProTWIN trial randomized women with a multiple pregnancy to pessary use vs standard care for the prevention of PTB. The trial showed no benefit in unselected women with a twin pregnancy, but showed a 60% reduction in poor perinatal outcomes in favor of the pessary group in the subgroup of women with a mid-trimester short cervix (cervical length &lt; 38 mm). All women were invited to participate in a follow-up study 4 years after their participation in the ProTWIN trial. In this follow-up study, maternal quality of life was assessed using t</pubmed_abstract><journal>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal><pagination>771-777</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9328140</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Consequences of cervical pessary for subsequent pregnancy: follow-up of randomized clinical trial (ProTWIN).</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9328140</pmcid><pubmed_authors>van 't Hooft J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oudijk MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mol BWJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Limburg Stirum EVJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simons NE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Boer MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zegveld SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pajkrt E</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Consequences of cervical pessary for subsequent pregnancy: follow-up of randomized clinical trial (ProTWIN).</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate the effect of cervical pessary, as a strategy to prevent preterm birth (PTB), on the outcome of subsequent pregnancy and maternal quality of life 4 years after the index twin pregnancy.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between 2009 and 2012, the ProTWIN trial randomized women with a multiple pregnancy to pessary use vs standard care for the prevention of PTB. The trial showed no benefit in unselected women with a twin pregnancy, but showed a 60% reduction in poor perinatal outcomes in favor of the pessary group in the subgroup of women with a mid-trimester short cervix (cervical length &lt; 38 mm). All women were invited to participate in a follow-up study 4 years after their participation in the ProTWIN trial. In this follow-up study, maternal quality of life was assessed using t</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-18T18:05:50.969Z</modification><creation>2025-04-07T05:43:20.271Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9328140</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34826166</pubmed><doi>10.1002/uog.24821</doi></cross_references></HashMap>