<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>60(1)</volume><submitter>Dawood Y</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Although fetal autopsy is generally recommended to confirm or refute the antemortem diagnosis, parental acceptance of the procedure has fallen over time, mainly due to its invasiveness. Contrast-enhanced microfocus CT (micro-CT) and high-field magnetic resonance imaging (HF-MRI, ≥ 3 Tesla) have both been suggested as non-invasive alternatives to conventional fetal autopsy for fetuses &lt; 20 weeks of gestation. The aim of this study was to compare these two modalities in postmortem whole-body fetal imaging.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this study, the imaging process and quality of micro-CT and HF-MRI were compared using both qualitative and quantitative assessments. For the qualitative evaluation, fetal anatomy experts scored 56 HF-MRI and 56 micro-CT images of four human fetuses aged</pubmed_abstract><journal>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal><pagination>109-117</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9328149</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparison of postmortem whole-body contrast-enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9328149</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Honhoff C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van der Post AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roosendaal SD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pajkrt E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Strijkers GJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dawood Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coolen BF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Bakker BS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of postmortem whole-body contrast-enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Although fetal autopsy is generally recommended to confirm or refute the antemortem diagnosis, parental acceptance of the procedure has fallen over time, mainly due to its invasiveness. Contrast-enhanced microfocus CT (micro-CT) and high-field magnetic resonance imaging (HF-MRI, ≥ 3 Tesla) have both been suggested as non-invasive alternatives to conventional fetal autopsy for fetuses &lt; 20 weeks of gestation. The aim of this study was to compare these two modalities in postmortem whole-body fetal imaging.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this study, the imaging process and quality of micro-CT and HF-MRI were compared using both qualitative and quantitative assessments. For the qualitative evaluation, fetal anatomy experts scored 56 HF-MRI and 56 micro-CT images of four human fetuses aged</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jul</publication><modification>2025-04-18T18:07:06.534Z</modification><creation>2025-04-07T05:46:10.269Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9328149</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34826157</pubmed><doi>10.1002/uog.24827</doi></cross_references></HashMap>