<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>26(4)</volume><submitter>Park SY</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>This systematic review aims to identify factors associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), including the uptake rate and decision timing, among women at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We found 4,935 relevant studies using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO on July 6, 2020. Two authors screened the articles and extracted data. Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality assessment of articles was conducted using the Risk of Bias for Nonrandomized Studies tool.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Five types of factors were identified (demographic factors, clinical factors, family history of cancer, psychological factors, and objective cancer risk). The specific significant factors were older age, having child(ren), being a</pubmed_abstract><journal>Korean journal of women health nursing</journal><pagination>285-299</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9328615</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Factors associated with the decision to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9328615</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kim S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park SY</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Factors associated with the decision to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>This systematic review aims to identify factors associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), including the uptake rate and decision timing, among women at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We found 4,935 relevant studies using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO on July 6, 2020. Two authors screened the articles and extracted data. Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality assessment of articles was conducted using the Risk of Bias for Nonrandomized Studies tool.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Five types of factors were identified (demographic factors, clinical factors, family history of cancer, psychological factors, and objective cancer risk). The specific significant factors were older age, having child(ren), being a</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-04T09:41:40.642Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T09:41:40.642Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9328615</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36312308</pubmed><doi>10.4069/kjwhn.2020.11.19</doi></cross_references></HashMap>