<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(7)</volume><submitter>Omil-Lima D</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Limited data guide urological practice when employing prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in active surveillance (AS) protocols. To determine the ability of prostate MRI to predict pathological progression in AS patients, we correlated findings of serial MRI with results of surveillance biopsies.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients on AS with ≥2 prostate MRI and ≥2 prostate biopsies were included. Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score upgrade, as assigned by experienced radiologists, was used to assess the ability of imaging to predict pathological biopsy progression. Imaging test statistics and the odds ratio of pathological progression according to MRI upgrade were calculated.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Of 121 patients meeting criteria, 36 (30%) demonstrated MRI u</pubmed_abstract><journal>Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada</journal><pagination>E370-E374</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9328855</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging fails to predict pathological progression in patients on active surveillance.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9328855</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kim A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ponsky L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weinstein I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gupta K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sheyn D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Omil-Lima D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging fails to predict pathological progression in patients on active surveillance.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Limited data guide urological practice when employing prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in active surveillance (AS) protocols. To determine the ability of prostate MRI to predict pathological progression in AS patients, we correlated findings of serial MRI with results of surveillance biopsies.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients on AS with ≥2 prostate MRI and ≥2 prostate biopsies were included. Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score upgrade, as assigned by experienced radiologists, was used to assess the ability of imaging to predict pathological biopsy progression. Imaging test statistics and the odds ratio of pathological progression according to MRI upgrade were calculated.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Of 121 patients meeting criteria, 36 (30%) demonstrated MRI u</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jul</publication><modification>2025-04-18T18:09:10.347Z</modification><creation>2025-04-07T05:40:17.572Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9328855</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35230933</pubmed><doi>10.5489/cuaj.7541</doi></cross_references></HashMap>