<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zhou J</submitter><funding>NINDS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>5899-5915</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9337599</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>42(30)</volume><pubmed_abstract>While conflict between incompatible goals has well-known effects on actions, in many situations the same action may produce harmful or beneficial consequences during different periods in a nonconflicting manner, e.g., crossing the street during a red or green light. To avoid harm, subjects must be cautious to inhibit the action specifically when it is punished, as in passive avoidance, but act when it is beneficial, as in active avoidance or active approach. In mice of both sexes performing a signaled action to avoid harm or obtain reward, we found that addition of a new rule that punishes the action when it occurs unsignaled delays the timing of the signaled action in an apparent sign of increased caution. Caution depended on task signaling, contingency, and reinforcement type. Interestin</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience</journal><pubmed_title>Caution Influences Avoidance and Approach Behaviors Differently.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9337599</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 NS104810</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R35 NS097272</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Hormigo S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Castro-Alamancos MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sajid MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Caution Influences Avoidance and Approach Behaviors Differently.</name><description>While conflict between incompatible goals has well-known effects on actions, in many situations the same action may produce harmful or beneficial consequences during different periods in a nonconflicting manner, e.g., crossing the street during a red or green light. To avoid harm, subjects must be cautious to inhibit the action specifically when it is punished, as in passive avoidance, but act when it is beneficial, as in active avoidance or active approach. In mice of both sexes performing a signaled action to avoid harm or obtain reward, we found that addition of a new rule that punishes the action when it occurs unsignaled delays the timing of the signaled action in an apparent sign of increased caution. Caution depended on task signaling, contingency, and reinforcement type. Interestin</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jul</publication><modification>2025-04-22T06:34:12.482Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T21:46:35.601Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9337599</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35705490</pubmed><doi>10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1892-21.2022</doi><doi>10.1523/jneurosci.1892-21.2022</doi></cross_references></HashMap>