<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Dercle L</submitter><funding>Alain Rahmouni French Society of Radiology-CERF</funding><funding>Fondation Philanthropia</funding><funding>National Cancer Institute</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>Fondation Nuovo-Soldati</funding><pagination>108850</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9345686</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>125</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>The clinical adoption of quantitative imaging biomarkers (radiomics) has established the need for high quality contrast-enhancement in medical images. We aimed to develop a machine-learning algorithm for Quality Control of Contrast-Enhancement on CT-scan (CECT-QC).&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Multicenter data from four independent cohorts [A, B, C, D] of patients with measurable liver lesions were analyzed retrospectively (patients:time-points; 503:3397): [A] dynamic CTs from primary liver cancer (60:2359); [B] triphasic CTs from primary liver cancer (31:93); [C] triphasic CTs from hepatocellular carcinoma (121:363); [D] portal venous phase CTs of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (291:582). Patients from cohort A were randomized to training-set (48:1884) and test-set (12:475). A random forest classifier was trained and tested to identify five contrast-enhancement phases. The input was the mean intensity of the abdominal aorta and the portal vein measured on a single abdominal CT scan image at a single time-point. The output to be predicted was: non-contrast [NCP], early-arterial [E-AP], optimal-arterial [O-AP], optimal-portal [O-PVP], and late-portal [L-PVP]. Clinical utility was assessed in cohorts B, C, and D.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The CECT-QC algorithm showed performances of 98 %, 90 %, and 84 % for predicting NCP, O-AP, and O-PVP, respectively. O-PVP was reached in half of patients and was associated with a peak in liver malignancy density. Contrast-enhancement quality significantly influenced radiomics features deciphering the phenotype of liver neoplasms.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>A single CT-image can be used to differentiate five contrast-enhancement phases for radiomics-based precision medicine in the most common liver neoplasms occurring in patients with or without liver cirrhosis.</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of radiology</journal><pubmed_title>Using a single abdominal computed tomography image to differentiate five contrast-enhancement phases: A machine-learning algorithm for radiomics-based precision medicine.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9345686</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U01 CA225431</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Schwartz LH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dercle L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luk L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rousseau H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mokrane FZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peron JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Revel-Mouroz P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ma J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen AP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xie C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Otal P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Using a single abdominal computed tomography image to differentiate five contrast-enhancement phases: A machine-learning algorithm for radiomics-based precision medicine.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>The clinical adoption of quantitative imaging biomarkers (radiomics) has established the need for high quality contrast-enhancement in medical images. We aimed to develop a machine-learning algorithm for Quality Control of Contrast-Enhancement on CT-scan (CECT-QC).&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Multicenter data from four independent cohorts [A, B, C, D] of patients with measurable liver lesions were analyzed retrospectively (patients:time-points; 503:3397): [A] dynamic CTs from primary liver cancer (60:2359); [B] triphasic CTs from primary liver cancer (31:93); [C] triphasic CTs from hepatocellular carcinoma (121:363); [D] portal venous phase CTs of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (291:582). Patients from cohort A were randomized to training-set (48:1884) and test-set (12:475). A random forest classifier was trained and tested to identify five contrast-enhancement phases. The input was the mean intensity of the abdominal aorta and the portal vein measured on a single abdominal CT scan image at a single time-point. The output to be predicted was: non-contrast [NCP], early-arterial [E-AP], optimal-arterial [O-AP], optimal-portal [O-PVP], and late-portal [L-PVP]. Clinical utility was assessed in cohorts B, C, and D.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The CECT-QC algorithm showed performances of 98 %, 90 %, and 84 % for predicting NCP, O-AP, and O-PVP, respectively. O-PVP was reached in half of patients and was associated with a peak in liver malignancy density. Contrast-enhancement quality significantly influenced radiomics features deciphering the phenotype of liver neoplasms.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>A single CT-image can be used to differentiate five contrast-enhancement phases for radiomics-based precision medicine in the most common liver neoplasms occurring in patients with or without liver cirrhosis.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-18T13:16:03.667Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T05:06:16.347Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9345686</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32070870</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108850</doi></cross_references></HashMap>