{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["9"],"submitter":["Sun N"],"pubmed_abstract":["To evaluate the accuracy of the smartwatch in estimating carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). A cohort of gender-matched volunteers aged 18-80 years were recruited. At the sitting and supine positions, cfPWV was measured alternately by smartwatch and CompliorAnalyse, for each participant, and nine sets of data were collected from each participant with a 60 s interval between measurements. The accuracy of cfPWV measurement for smartwatches was assessed using mean error (ME) and mean absolute error (MAE), while the consistency of the two methods was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis and concordance class correlation. A total of 347 participants were enrolled. The mean cfPWV was 9.01 ± 2.29 m/s measured by CompliorAnalyse and 9.06 ± 1.94 m/s by smartwatch. The consistency corre"],"journal":["Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine"],"pagination":["893557"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9353553"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Accuracy Evaluation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Estimated by Smart Terminal Watch."],"pmcid":["PMC9353553"],"pubmed_authors":["Sun N","Liu J","Xi Y","Cui Y","Zeng Z","Chen Y","Wang H","Yang F","Wang L"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Accuracy Evaluation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Estimated by Smart Terminal Watch.","description":"To evaluate the accuracy of the smartwatch in estimating carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). A cohort of gender-matched volunteers aged 18-80 years were recruited. At the sitting and supine positions, cfPWV was measured alternately by smartwatch and CompliorAnalyse, for each participant, and nine sets of data were collected from each participant with a 60 s interval between measurements. The accuracy of cfPWV measurement for smartwatches was assessed using mean error (ME) and mean absolute error (MAE), while the consistency of the two methods was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis and concordance class correlation. A total of 347 participants were enrolled. The mean cfPWV was 9.01 ± 2.29 m/s measured by CompliorAnalyse and 9.06 ± 1.94 m/s by smartwatch. The consistency corre","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022","modification":"2025-04-22T11:04:01.221Z","creation":"2025-02-19T04:53:47.929Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9353553","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35935640"],"doi":["10.3389/fcvm.2022.893557"]}}