{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["56(5)"],"submitter":["Garashi HY"],"funding":["Kuwait Ministry of Health"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>In the context of the growth of pharmacovigilance (PV) among developing countries, this systematic review aims to synthesise current research evaluating developing countries' PV systems' performance.<h4>Methods</h4>EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed studies published in English between 2012 and 2021. Reference lists of included studies were screened. Included studies were quality assessed using Hawker et al.'s nine-item checklist; data were extracted using the WHO PV indicators checklist. Scores were assigned to each group of indicators and used to compare countries' PV performance.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty-one unique studies from 51 countries were included. Of a total possible quality score of 36, most studies were rated medium "],"journal":["Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science"],"pagination":["717-743"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9356965"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["A Systematic Review of Pharmacovigilance Systems in Developing Countries Using the WHO Pharmacovigilance Indicators."],"pmcid":["PMC9356965"],"pubmed_authors":["Garashi HY","Steinke DT","Schafheutle EI"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"A Systematic Review of Pharmacovigilance Systems in Developing Countries Using the WHO Pharmacovigilance Indicators.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>In the context of the growth of pharmacovigilance (PV) among developing countries, this systematic review aims to synthesise current research evaluating developing countries' PV systems' performance.<h4>Methods</h4>EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed studies published in English between 2012 and 2021. Reference lists of included studies were screened. Included studies were quality assessed using Hawker et al.'s nine-item checklist; data were extracted using the WHO PV indicators checklist. Scores were assigned to each group of indicators and used to compare countries' PV performance.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty-one unique studies from 51 countries were included. Of a total possible quality score of 36, most studies were rated medium ","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Sep","modification":"2026-03-31T11:23:16.561Z","creation":"2025-02-19T02:27:08.967Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9356965","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35657484"],"doi":["10.1007/s43441-022-00415-y"]}}