<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Liu J</submitter><funding>Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><pagination>72</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9357592</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The mortality of extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative (XDR GN) bacilli-induced ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is extremely high. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled (IH) plus intravenous (IV) polymyxin B versus IV polymyxin B in XDR GN bacilli VAP patients.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A retrospective multi-center observational cohort study was performed at eight ICUs between January 1&lt;sup>st&lt;/sup> 2018, and January 1&lt;sup>st&lt;/sup> 2020 in China. Data from all patients treated with polymyxin B for a microbiologically confirmed VAP were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure of VAP. The favorable clinical outcome, microbiological outcome, VAP-related mortality and all-cause mortality during hospitalization, and side effect</pubmed_abstract><journal>Annals of intensive care</journal><pubmed_title>Low-dose intravenous plus inhaled versus intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of extensive drug-resistant Gram-negative ventilator-associated pneumonia in the critical illnesses: a multi-center matched case-control study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9357592</pmcid><funding_grant_id>81971869</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>81873944</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Pan X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yao J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xiong L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tian M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wen Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huang S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>TaoWang</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Teboul JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shao M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Du H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Low-dose intravenous plus inhaled versus intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of extensive drug-resistant Gram-negative ventilator-associated pneumonia in the critical illnesses: a multi-center matched case-control study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The mortality of extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative (XDR GN) bacilli-induced ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is extremely high. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled (IH) plus intravenous (IV) polymyxin B versus IV polymyxin B in XDR GN bacilli VAP patients.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A retrospective multi-center observational cohort study was performed at eight ICUs between January 1&lt;sup>st&lt;/sup> 2018, and January 1&lt;sup>st&lt;/sup> 2020 in China. Data from all patients treated with polymyxin B for a microbiologically confirmed VAP were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure of VAP. The favorable clinical outcome, microbiological outcome, VAP-related mortality and all-cause mortality during hospitalization, and side effect</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Aug</publication><modification>2026-07-14T17:37:02.893Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T08:45:05.764Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9357592</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35934730</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s13613-022-01033-5</doi></cross_references></HashMap>