<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(8)</volume><submitter>Hopkins SR</submitter><pubmed_abstract>As sustainable development practitioners have worked to "ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all" and "conserve life on land and below water", what progress has been made with win-win interventions that reduce human infectious disease burdens while advancing conservation goals? Using a systematic literature review, we identified 46 proposed solutions, which we then investigated individually using targeted literature reviews. The proposed solutions addressed diverse conservation threats and human infectious diseases, and thus, the proposed interventions varied in scale, costs, and impacts. Some potential solutions had medium-quality to high-quality evidence for previous success in achieving proposed impacts in one or both sectors. However, there were notable evidence gaps within</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Lancet. Planetary health</journal><pagination>e694-e705</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9364143</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Evidence gaps and diversity among potential win-win solutions for conservation and human infectious disease control.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9364143</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Peel AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fiorella KJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>MacDonald AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bonds MH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olson SH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sokolow SH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuris AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leon AE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wilson M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Metz DCG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mandle L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Howard ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nova N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Leo GA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lopez Carr D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kwong LH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fornberg JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jones IJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stewart Merrill TE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dobson AP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garchitorena A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wood CL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Remais JV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hopkins SR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lund AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>LeBoa C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Buck JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lafferty KD</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Evidence gaps and diversity among potential win-win solutions for conservation and human infectious disease control.</name><description>As sustainable development practitioners have worked to "ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all" and "conserve life on land and below water", what progress has been made with win-win interventions that reduce human infectious disease burdens while advancing conservation goals? Using a systematic literature review, we identified 46 proposed solutions, which we then investigated individually using targeted literature reviews. The proposed solutions addressed diverse conservation threats and human infectious diseases, and thus, the proposed interventions varied in scale, costs, and impacts. Some potential solutions had medium-quality to high-quality evidence for previous success in achieving proposed impacts in one or both sectors. However, there were notable evidence gaps within</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-27T03:25:45.305Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T18:46:48.721Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9364143</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35932789</pubmed><doi>10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00148-6</doi></cross_references></HashMap>