biostudies-literaturePeng Wthe Science and Technological Supports Project of Sichuan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China307https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9364544biostudies-literatureUnknown22(1)<h4>Aims</h4>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of the preoperative aminotransferase to albumin ratio (AAR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy.<h4>Methods</h4>From five hospitals, a total of 991 patients with HCC admitted between December 2014 and December 2019 were included as the primary cohort and 883 patients with HCC admitted between December 2010 and December 2014 were included as the validation cohort. The X-tile software was conducted to identify the optimal cut-off value of AAR.<h4>Results</h4>In the primary cohort, the optimal cut-off value of the AAR was defined as 0.7 and 1.6, respectively. Compared to patients with AAR 0.7-1.6, those with AAR > 1.6 showed significantly worse overall survival (OS) and RFS, whereas those with AABMC surgeryPreoperative aspartate aminotransferase to albumin ratio correlates with tumor characteristics and predicts outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative hepatectomy: a multicenter study.PMC93645442022YFS02572022YFS02552022YFS03778207062582100650Peng WShen JXie FRan SLeng SZhang YSun XDai JWen TfalsePreoperative aspartate aminotransferase to albumin ratio correlates with tumor characteristics and predicts outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative hepatectomy: a multicenter study.<h4>Aims</h4>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of the preoperative aminotransferase to albumin ratio (AAR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy.<h4>Methods</h4>From five hospitals, a total of 991 patients with HCC admitted between December 2014 and December 2019 were included as the primary cohort and 883 patients with HCC admitted between December 2010 and December 2014 were included as the validation cohort. The X-tile software was conducted to identify the optimal cut-off value of AAR.<h4>Results</h4>In the primary cohort, the optimal cut-off value of the AAR was defined as 0.7 and 1.6, respectively. Compared to patients with AAR 0.7-1.6, those with AAR > 1.6 showed significantly worse overall survival (OS) and RFS, whereas those with AA2022-01-01T00:00:00Z2022 Aug2025-04-18T15:47:37.952Z2025-02-19T01:55:33.351ZS-EPMC93645443594552010.1186/s12893-022-01751-4