<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13</volume><submitter>Correa IA</submitter><funding>Abbott Laboratories</funding><funding>Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico</funding><funding>Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro</funding><funding>Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior</funding><funding>Instituto Serrapilheira</funding><funding>Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro</funding><pubmed_abstract>Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) transmission occurs even among fully vaccinated individuals; thus, prompt identification of infected patients is central to control viral circulation. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) are highly specific, but sensitivity is variable. Discordant RT-qPCR vs. Ag-RDT results are reported, raising the question of whether negative Ag-RDT in positive RT-qPCR samples could imply the absence of infectious viruses. To study the relationship between negative Ag-RDT results with virological, molecular, and serological parameters, we selected a cross-sectional and a follow-up dataset and analyzed virus culture, subgenomic RNA quantification, and sequencing to determine infectious viruses and mutations. We demonstrated that RT-qPCR positive while SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT negative discordant results correlate with the absence of infectious virus in nasopharyngeal samples. A decrease in sgRNA detection together with an expected increase in detectable anti-S and anti-N IgGs was also verified in these samples. The data clearly demonstrate that a negative Ag-RDT sample is less likely to harbor infectious SARS-CoV-2 and, consequently, has a lower transmissible potential.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in microbiology</journal><pagination>912138</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9364907</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A SARS-CoV-2 Negative Antigen Rapid Diagnostic in RT-qPCR Positive Samples Correlates With a Low Likelihood of Infectious Viruses in the Nasopharynx.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9364907</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Vijesurier R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Correa IA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>da Costa LJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Policarpo C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferreira ODC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mariani D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cunha MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cloherty GA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ribeiro LJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>da Silva GP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tanuri A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galliez RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hackett J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leitao IC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Souza MR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berg M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moreira FRR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Campos MF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Faffe DS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goncalves CCA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rodgers MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>da Cruz TFC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gonzales L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nascimento ERDS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maia RA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Castineiras TMPP</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A SARS-CoV-2 Negative Antigen Rapid Diagnostic in RT-qPCR Positive Samples Correlates With a Low Likelihood of Infectious Viruses in the Nasopharynx.</name><description>Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) transmission occurs even among fully vaccinated individuals; thus, prompt identification of infected patients is central to control viral circulation. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) are highly specific, but sensitivity is variable. Discordant RT-qPCR vs. Ag-RDT results are reported, raising the question of whether negative Ag-RDT in positive RT-qPCR samples could imply the absence of infectious viruses. To study the relationship between negative Ag-RDT results with virological, molecular, and serological parameters, we selected a cross-sectional and a follow-up dataset and analyzed virus culture, subgenomic RNA quantification, and sequencing to determine infectious viruses and mutations. We demonstrated that RT-qPCR positive while SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT negative discordant results correlate with the absence of infectious virus in nasopharyngeal samples. A decrease in sgRNA detection together with an expected increase in detectable anti-S and anti-N IgGs was also verified in these samples. The data clearly demonstrate that a negative Ag-RDT sample is less likely to harbor infectious SARS-CoV-2 and, consequently, has a lower transmissible potential.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2024-10-18T22:40:15.836Z</modification><creation>2024-10-18T22:40:15.836Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9364907</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35966714</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fmicb.2022.912138</doi></cross_references></HashMap>