<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Pick CM</submitter><funding>Grantová Agentura České Republiky</funding><funding>Akademie Věd České Republiky</funding><funding>Akademie Věd České Republiky (Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic)</funding><funding>Grantová Agentura České Republiky (Grant Agency of the Czech Republic)</funding><funding>National Science Foundation Graduate Student Fellowship Program</funding><funding>Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (São Paulo Research Foundation)</funding><funding>Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo</funding><funding>National Science Foundation (NSF)</funding><funding>Universidad de La Frontera</funding><funding>National Science Foundation</funding><funding>Universidad de La Frontera (University of the Frontier)</funding><pagination>499</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9380674</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>H﻿ow does psychology vary across human societies? The fundamental social motives framework adopts an evolutionary approach to capture the broad range of human social goals within a taxonomy of ancestrally recurring threats and opportunities. These motives-self-protection, disease avoidance, affiliation, status, mate acquisition, mate retention, and kin care-are high in fitness relevance and everyday salience, yet understudied cross-culturally. Here, we gathered data on these motives in 42 countries (N = 15,915) in two cross-sectional waves, including 19 countries (N = 10,907) for which data were gathered in both waves. Wave 1 was collected from mid-2016 through late 2019 (32 countries, N = 8,998; 3,302 male, 5,585 female; M&lt;sub>age&lt;/sub> = 24.43, SD = 7.91). Wave 2 was collected from April</pubmed_abstract><journal>Scientific data</journal><pubmed_title>Fundamental social motives measured across forty-two cultures in two waves.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9380674</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2017/11748-7</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DIUFRO DI20-0080</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2018/01347-8</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1822713</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>68081740</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>17-14387S</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Sette C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Onyishi IE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galindo-Caballero OJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ko A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Uz I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sevincer AT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moran S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Talhelm T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fetvadjiev VH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cruz JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hrebickova M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rizwan M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Na J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gomez-Jacinto L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wiezel A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kara-Yakoubian M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamamura T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Suh EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kenrick DT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Johnson JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fischer R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wormley AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>David D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Samoylenko ES</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zambrano D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galdi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sznycer D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ugwu FO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Choy BKC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fetvadjieva S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mafra AL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Espinosa A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ilic D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Defelipe RP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Varella MAC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Varnum MEW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hansson LS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kohut M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pasay-An E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Graf S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ceylan-Batur S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>David OA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roth E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Han S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Murata A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Savchenko TN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stanciu A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Golovina EV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grossmann I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fernandez AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gul P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Malanchuk O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ndiaye SAL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karl JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hitokoto H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wei L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Al-Shawaf L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Valentova JV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lasselin J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pick CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elmas P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Uskul AK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barry O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boonyasiriwat W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Halama P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bereby-Meyer Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Crispim AC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Golovina GM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brandstatter E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li NP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salgado S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Awad E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Skoog E</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Fundamental social motives measured across forty-two cultures in two waves.</name><description>H﻿ow does psychology vary across human societies? The fundamental social motives framework adopts an evolutionary approach to capture the broad range of human social goals within a taxonomy of ancestrally recurring threats and opportunities. These motives-self-protection, disease avoidance, affiliation, status, mate acquisition, mate retention, and kin care-are high in fitness relevance and everyday salience, yet understudied cross-culturally. Here, we gathered data on these motives in 42 countries (N = 15,915) in two cross-sectional waves, including 19 countries (N = 10,907) for which data were gathered in both waves. Wave 1 was collected from mid-2016 through late 2019 (32 countries, N = 8,998; 3,302 male, 5,585 female; M&lt;sub>age&lt;/sub> = 24.43, SD = 7.91). Wave 2 was collected from April</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-26T19:48:47.788Z</modification><creation>2024-11-14T03:43:15.941Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9380674</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35974021</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41597-022-01579-w</doi></cross_references></HashMap>