<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Rockall AG</submitter><funding>Medical Research Council Department of Health</funding><funding>Cancer Research UK</funding><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><pagination>6457-6466</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9401562</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>27(23)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Preoperative nodal staging is important for planning treatment in cervical cancer and endometrial cancer, but remains challenging. We compare nodal staging accuracy of &lt;sup>18&lt;/sup>F-ethyl-choline-(FEC)-PET/CT, &lt;sup>18&lt;/sup>F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-(FDG)-PET/CT, and diffusion-weighted-MRI (DW-MRI) with conventional morphologic MRI.&lt;h4>Experimental design&lt;/h4>A prospective, multicenter observational study of diagnostic accuracy for nodal metastases was undertaken in 5 gyne-oncology centers. FEC-PET/CT, FDG-PET/CT, and DW-MRI were compared with nodal size and morphology on MRI. Reference standard was strictly correlated nodal histology. Eligibility included operable cervical cancer stage ≥ 1B1 or endometrial cancer (grade 3 any stage with myometrial invasion or grade 1-2 stage </pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research</journal><pubmed_title>Diagnostic Accuracy of FEC-PET/CT, FDG-PET/CT, and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Detection of Nodal Metastases in Surgically Treated Endometrial and Cervical Carcinoma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9401562</pmcid><funding_grant_id>C444/A15953</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>12783</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>C1519/A16463</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Vosper L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Attygalle A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koh DM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sundar S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stringfellow H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wilson W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Paepe KN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ind T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barton D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dina R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oram D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ghaem-Maghami S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ganesan R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nobbenhuis M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singh N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fotopoulou C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Butler J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kyrgiou M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sahdev A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Warbey V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Taylor A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coetzee C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hill J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lalondrelle S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Manchanda R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lawrence A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rockall AG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cook GJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brockbank E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hackshaw A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bharwani N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miquel M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yazbek J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stewart V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guest P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>MAPPING Study Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dobson M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jeyarajah A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zerizer I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rosof-Williams D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davies M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hazell S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Farthing A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barwick TD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sohaib A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martin-Hirsch P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Diagnostic Accuracy of FEC-PET/CT, FDG-PET/CT, and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Detection of Nodal Metastases in Surgically Treated Endometrial and Cervical Carcinoma.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Preoperative nodal staging is important for planning treatment in cervical cancer and endometrial cancer, but remains challenging. We compare nodal staging accuracy of &lt;sup>18&lt;/sup>F-ethyl-choline-(FEC)-PET/CT, &lt;sup>18&lt;/sup>F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-(FDG)-PET/CT, and diffusion-weighted-MRI (DW-MRI) with conventional morphologic MRI.&lt;h4>Experimental design&lt;/h4>A prospective, multicenter observational study of diagnostic accuracy for nodal metastases was undertaken in 5 gyne-oncology centers. FEC-PET/CT, FDG-PET/CT, and DW-MRI were compared with nodal size and morphology on MRI. Reference standard was strictly correlated nodal histology. Eligibility included operable cervical cancer stage ≥ 1B1 or endometrial cancer (grade 3 any stage with myometrial invasion or grade 1-2 stage </description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-01T13:55:37.368Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T13:10:13.366Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9401562</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34526364</pubmed><doi>10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1834</doi></cross_references></HashMap>