<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Ghione P</submitter><funding>Barts Charity</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>851-860</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9412012</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>140(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>In the pivotal ZUMA-5 trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) demonstrated high rates of durable response in relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) patients. Here, outcomes from ZUMA-5 are compared with the international SCHOLAR-5 cohort, which applied key ZUMA-5 trial eligibility criteria simulating randomized controlled trial conditions. SCHOLAR-5 data were extracted from institutions in 5 countries, and from 1 historical clinical trial, for r/r FL patients who initiated a third or higher line of therapy after July 2014. Patient characteristics were balanced through propensity scoring on prespecified prognostic factors using standardized mortality ratio (SMR) weighting. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated using weighted Kaplan-Meier analysis. Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were compared using weighted odds ratios. The 143 ScHOLAR-5 patients reduced to an effective sample of 85 patients after SMR weighting vs 86 patients in ZUMA-5. Median follow-up time was 25.4 and 23.3 months for SCHOLAR-5 and ZUMA-5. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in SCHOLAR-5 were 59.8 months and 12.7 months and not reached in ZUMA-5. Hazard ratios for OS and PFS were 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.83) and 0.30 (95% CI, 0.18-0.49). The ORR and CR rate were 49.9% and 29.9% in SCHOLAR-5 and 94.2% and 79.1% in ZUMA-5, for odds ratios of 16.2 (95% CI, 5.6-46.9) and 8.9 (95% CI, 4.3-18.3). Compared with available therapies, axi-cel demonstrated an improvement in meaningful clinical endpoints, suggesting axi-cel addresses an important unmet need for r/r FL patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03105336.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Blood</journal><pubmed_title>Comparative effectiveness of ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) vs SCHOLAR-5 external control in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9412012</pmcid><funding_grant_id>G-002220</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA008748</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Snider JT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palomba ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gribben JG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Neelapu SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nahas M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brookhart MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ghesquieres H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hatswell AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bobillo S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ghione P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Radford J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deighton K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jacobson CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ribeiro MT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jung AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kanters S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparative effectiveness of ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) vs SCHOLAR-5 external control in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.</name><description>In the pivotal ZUMA-5 trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) demonstrated high rates of durable response in relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) patients. Here, outcomes from ZUMA-5 are compared with the international SCHOLAR-5 cohort, which applied key ZUMA-5 trial eligibility criteria simulating randomized controlled trial conditions. SCHOLAR-5 data were extracted from institutions in 5 countries, and from 1 historical clinical trial, for r/r FL patients who initiated a third or higher line of therapy after July 2014. Patient characteristics were balanced through propensity scoring on prespecified prognostic factors using standardized mortality ratio (SMR) weighting. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated using weighted Kaplan-Meier analysis. Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were compared using weighted odds ratios. The 143 ScHOLAR-5 patients reduced to an effective sample of 85 patients after SMR weighting vs 86 patients in ZUMA-5. Median follow-up time was 25.4 and 23.3 months for SCHOLAR-5 and ZUMA-5. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in SCHOLAR-5 were 59.8 months and 12.7 months and not reached in ZUMA-5. Hazard ratios for OS and PFS were 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.83) and 0.30 (95% CI, 0.18-0.49). The ORR and CR rate were 49.9% and 29.9% in SCHOLAR-5 and 94.2% and 79.1% in ZUMA-5, for odds ratios of 16.2 (95% CI, 5.6-46.9) and 8.9 (95% CI, 4.3-18.3). Compared with available therapies, axi-cel demonstrated an improvement in meaningful clinical endpoints, suggesting axi-cel addresses an important unmet need for r/r FL patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03105336.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Aug</publication><modification>2024-11-07T03:15:26.672Z</modification><creation>2024-11-07T03:15:26.672Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9412012</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35679476</pubmed><doi>10.1182/blood.2021014375</doi></cross_references></HashMap>