{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Lutzner J"],"funding":["Technische Universität Dresden","Aesculap"],"pagination":["3000-3006"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9418092"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["30(9)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Purpose</h4>If substitution of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty is necessary, there are two options available: posterior stabilized (PS) design with a post-cam mechanism or anterior-lipped ultracongruent (UC) inserts. UC inserts have the advantage that no femoral box is necessary and a standard femoral component can be used. The aim of this study was to compare the range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcome (PRO) after UC and PS fixed-bearing TKA. Better ROM in PS TKA and no difference in PRO between both designs was hypothesized.<h4>Methods</h4>A randomized controlled trial with 127 patients receiving a fixed-bearing UC or PS design of the same knee system was performed. Nine patients died and there were four revision surgeries. 107 patients completed the 5-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcome was assessed. Patellofemoral problems were evaluated using selected applicable questions of the Oxford Knee Score (getting up from a table, kneeling, climbing stairs).<h4>Results</h4>Surgical time was 10 min shorter in the UC group (p < 0.001). After 5 years, both groups demonstrated good knee function and health-related quality of life without significant differences between the groups. Both groups demonstrated a high satisfaction score and the majority of patients would undergo this surgery again. Patellofemoral problems were recognized more frequently in the PS group (p = 0.025).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Both designs demonstrated similar good results after 5 years. Stabilization with an anterior-lipped UC insert can be considered a safe alternative to the well-established PS design if cruciate substitution is necessary.<h4>Level of evidence: 1</h4>"],"journal":["Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA"],"pubmed_title":["Ultracongruent insert design is a safe alternative to posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial."],"pmcid":["PMC9418092"],"funding_grant_id":["STEADINESS"],"pubmed_authors":["Beyer F","Lutzner C","Riedel R","Tille E","Lutzner J"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Ultracongruent insert design is a safe alternative to posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial.","description":"<h4>Purpose</h4>If substitution of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty is necessary, there are two options available: posterior stabilized (PS) design with a post-cam mechanism or anterior-lipped ultracongruent (UC) inserts. UC inserts have the advantage that no femoral box is necessary and a standard femoral component can be used. The aim of this study was to compare the range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcome (PRO) after UC and PS fixed-bearing TKA. Better ROM in PS TKA and no difference in PRO between both designs was hypothesized.<h4>Methods</h4>A randomized controlled trial with 127 patients receiving a fixed-bearing UC or PS design of the same knee system was performed. Nine patients died and there were four revision surgeries. 107 patients completed the 5-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcome was assessed. Patellofemoral problems were evaluated using selected applicable questions of the Oxford Knee Score (getting up from a table, kneeling, climbing stairs).<h4>Results</h4>Surgical time was 10 min shorter in the UC group (p < 0.001). After 5 years, both groups demonstrated good knee function and health-related quality of life without significant differences between the groups. Both groups demonstrated a high satisfaction score and the majority of patients would undergo this surgery again. Patellofemoral problems were recognized more frequently in the PS group (p = 0.025).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Both designs demonstrated similar good results after 5 years. Stabilization with an anterior-lipped UC insert can be considered a safe alternative to the well-established PS design if cruciate substitution is necessary.<h4>Level of evidence: 1</h4>","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Sep","modification":"2025-05-29T16:11:26.953Z","creation":"2025-04-06T01:50:19.735Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9418092","cross_references":{"pubmed":["33842984"],"doi":["10.1007/s00167-021-06545-4"]}}