<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Pinsker JE</submitter><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><pagination>635-642</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9422791</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>&lt;i>Background:&lt;/i>&lt;/b> Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have proven effective in increasing time-in-range during both clinical trials and real-world use. Further improvements in outcomes for single-hormone (insulin only) AID may be limited by suboptimal insulin delivery settings. &lt;b>&lt;i>Methods:&lt;/i>&lt;/b> Adults (≥18 years of age) with type 1 diabetes were randomized to either sensor-augmented pump (SAP) (inclusive of predictive low-glucose suspend) or adaptive zone model predictive control AID for 13 weeks, then crossed over to the other arm. Each week, the AID insulin delivery settings were sequentially and automatically updated by an adaptation system running on the study phone. Primary outcome was sensor glucose time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL, with noninferiority in percent time be</pubmed_abstract><journal>Diabetes technology &amp; therapeutics</journal><pubmed_title>Outpatient Randomized Crossover Comparison of Zone Model Predictive Control Automated Insulin Delivery with Weekly Data Driven Adaptation Versus Sensor-Augmented Pump: Results from the International Diabetes Closed-Loop Trial 4.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9422791</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 DK020541</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 DK036836</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UC4 DK108483</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K23 DK121942</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>McCrady-Spitzer S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Levy CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patibandla N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>H Belle S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kudva YC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eggerman T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Laffel LM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nolander L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Isganaitis E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Freiner E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brooks D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raghinaru D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Borgman S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ekhlaspour L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dassau E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lum JW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wysham C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>M Willi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Church MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DesJardins D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beck R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Buckingham BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Doyle FJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simha V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Legault L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Levister C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ambler-Osborn L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Green J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pinsker JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Murphy C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arreaza-Rubin G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kollman C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ogyaadu S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Passman S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Campos T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Green N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>iDCL Trial Research Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Desrochers H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deshpande S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shi D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hsu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kaur RJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Plesser M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Malley G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Castle J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Outpatient Randomized Crossover Comparison of Zone Model Predictive Control Automated Insulin Delivery with Weekly Data Driven Adaptation Versus Sensor-Augmented Pump: Results from the International Diabetes Closed-Loop Trial 4.</name><description>&lt;b>&lt;i>Background:&lt;/i>&lt;/b> Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have proven effective in increasing time-in-range during both clinical trials and real-world use. Further improvements in outcomes for single-hormone (insulin only) AID may be limited by suboptimal insulin delivery settings. &lt;b>&lt;i>Methods:&lt;/i>&lt;/b> Adults (≥18 years of age) with type 1 diabetes were randomized to either sensor-augmented pump (SAP) (inclusive of predictive low-glucose suspend) or adaptive zone model predictive control AID for 13 weeks, then crossed over to the other arm. Each week, the AID insulin delivery settings were sequentially and automatically updated by an adaptation system running on the study phone. Primary outcome was sensor glucose time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL, with noninferiority in percent time be</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Sep</publication><modification>2026-05-28T01:22:48.646Z</modification><creation>2025-04-07T10:19:51.268Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9422791</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35549708</pubmed><doi>10.1089/dia.2022.0084</doi></cross_references></HashMap>