<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Dickie S</submitter><funding>Australian Research Council</funding><pagination>nzac112</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9429971</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Policy makers are increasingly using nutrition classification schemes (NCSs) to assess a food's health potential for informing nutrition policy actions. However, there is wide variability among the NCSs implemented and no standard benchmark against which their contrasting assessments can be validated.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>This study aimed to compare the agreement of nutrient-, food-, and dietary-based NCSs in their assessment of a food's health potential within the Australian food supply, and examine the conceptual underpinnings and technical characteristics that explain differences in performance.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A dataset combining food compositional data from the Mintel Global New Products Database and the Australian Food Composition Database (AUSNUT 2011-2012) (&lt;i>n &lt;/i></pubmed_abstract><journal>Current developments in nutrition</journal><pubmed_title>Nutrition Classification Schemes for Informing Nutrition Policy in Australia: Nutrient-Based, Food-Based, or Dietary-Based?</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9429971</pmcid><funding_grant_id>DP190101323</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Woods J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lawrence M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Machado P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dickie S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Nutrition Classification Schemes for Informing Nutrition Policy in Australia: Nutrient-Based, Food-Based, or Dietary-Based?</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Policy makers are increasingly using nutrition classification schemes (NCSs) to assess a food's health potential for informing nutrition policy actions. However, there is wide variability among the NCSs implemented and no standard benchmark against which their contrasting assessments can be validated.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>This study aimed to compare the agreement of nutrient-, food-, and dietary-based NCSs in their assessment of a food's health potential within the Australian food supply, and examine the conceptual underpinnings and technical characteristics that explain differences in performance.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A dataset combining food compositional data from the Mintel Global New Products Database and the Australian Food Composition Database (AUSNUT 2011-2012) (&lt;i>n &lt;/i></description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Aug</publication><modification>2026-04-27T03:14:30.745Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T12:11:04.379Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9429971</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36060220</pubmed><doi>10.1093/cdn/nzac112</doi></cross_references></HashMap>