<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Weiss E</submitter><funding>European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme</funding><funding>European Federation of Phamaceutical Idustries and Associations</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIH</funding><funding>Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking</funding><pagination>1912-1918</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9431655</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>69(11)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP and VABP, respectively) are important for the evaluation of new antimicrobials. However, the heterogeneity in endpoints used in RCTs evaluating treatment of HABP/VABP may puzzle clinicians. The aim of this work was to reach a consensus on clinical endpoints to consider in future clinical trials evaluating antimicrobial treatment efficacy for HABP/VABP.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Twenty-six international experts from intensive care, infectious diseases, and the pharmaceutical industry were polled using the Delphi method.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The panel recommended a hierarchical composite endpoint including, by priority order, (1) survival at day 28, (2) mechanical ventilation-free day</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America</journal><pubmed_title>Elaboration of Consensus Clinical Endpoints to Evaluate Antimicrobial Treatment Efficacy in Future Hospital-acquired/Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia Clinical Trials.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9431655</pmcid><funding_grant_id>FP7/2007–2013</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>115523</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U19 AI135964</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Shorr AF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Prokocimer P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thamlikitkul V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rex JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Papazian L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eggimann P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chastre J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weiss E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rello J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Torres A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zahar JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ewig S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alder J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Engelhardt M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Asehnoune K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lipman J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Poulakou G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Timsit JF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wunderink RG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bonten MJM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kollef M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Talbot GH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luna C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palmer LB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Waele J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bassetti M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dimopoulos G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pagani L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martin-Loeches I</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Elaboration of Consensus Clinical Endpoints to Evaluate Antimicrobial Treatment Efficacy in Future Hospital-acquired/Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia Clinical Trials.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP and VABP, respectively) are important for the evaluation of new antimicrobials. However, the heterogeneity in endpoints used in RCTs evaluating treatment of HABP/VABP may puzzle clinicians. The aim of this work was to reach a consensus on clinical endpoints to consider in future clinical trials evaluating antimicrobial treatment efficacy for HABP/VABP.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Twenty-six international experts from intensive care, infectious diseases, and the pharmaceutical industry were polled using the Delphi method.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The panel recommended a hierarchical composite endpoint including, by priority order, (1) survival at day 28, (2) mechanical ventilation-free day</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-19T07:29:19.381Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T07:29:19.381Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9431655</accession><cross_references><pubmed>30722013</pubmed><doi>10.1093/cid/ciz093</doi></cross_references></HashMap>