<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Calabrese SK</submitter><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institute of Mental Health</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><pagination>1393-1421</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9434708</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>26(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Social biases may influence providers' judgments related to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and patients' consequent PrEP access. US primary and HIV care providers (n = 370) completed an experimental survey. Each provider reviewed one fictitious medical record of a patient seeking PrEP. Records varied by patient race (Black or White) and risk behavior (man who has sex with men [MSM], has sex with women [MSW], or injects drugs [MID]). Providers reported clinical judgments and completed measures of prejudice. Minimal evidence of racially biased judgments emerged. Providers expressing low-to-moderate sexual prejudice judged the MSM as more likely than the MSW to adhere to PrEP, which was associated with greater PrEP prescribing intention; sexual prejudice was negatively associated with antici</pubmed_abstract><journal>AIDS and behavior</journal><pubmed_title>An Experimental Study of the Effects of Patient Race, Sexual Orientation, and Injection Drug Use on Providers' PrEP-Related Clinical Judgments.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9434708</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 AI060354</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 MH062294</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AI117970</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01-MH103080</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30-MH062294</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30-AI060354</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01 MH103080</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30-AI117970</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kershaw TS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Calabrese SK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krakower DS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bunting SR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Del Rio-Gonzalez AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Earnshaw VA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kalwicz DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hansen NB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dovidio JF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Modrakovic D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Edelman EJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Magnus M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rosenberger JG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mayer KH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>An Experimental Study of the Effects of Patient Race, Sexual Orientation, and Injection Drug Use on Providers' PrEP-Related Clinical Judgments.</name><description>Social biases may influence providers' judgments related to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and patients' consequent PrEP access. US primary and HIV care providers (n = 370) completed an experimental survey. Each provider reviewed one fictitious medical record of a patient seeking PrEP. Records varied by patient race (Black or White) and risk behavior (man who has sex with men [MSM], has sex with women [MSW], or injects drugs [MID]). Providers reported clinical judgments and completed measures of prejudice. Minimal evidence of racially biased judgments emerged. Providers expressing low-to-moderate sexual prejudice judged the MSM as more likely than the MSW to adhere to PrEP, which was associated with greater PrEP prescribing intention; sexual prejudice was negatively associated with antici</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 May</publication><modification>2025-04-04T08:06:44.767Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T08:06:44.767Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9434708</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34750695</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s10461-021-03495-3</doi></cross_references></HashMap>