<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Pereira S</submitter><funding>NICHD NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHGRI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institute of Mental Health</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>National Human Genome Research Institute</funding><pagination>293-302</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9444963</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>189(7-8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Psychiatric polygenic risk scores (PRS) have potential utility in psychiatric care and prevention, but there are concerns about their implementation. We surveyed 960 US-based practicing child and adolescent psychiatrists' (CAP) about their experiences, perspectives, and potential uses of psychiatric PRS. While 23% of CAP reported that they had never heard of PRS, 10 % of respondents have had a patient/family bring PRS to them and 4% have generated PRS for patients. Though 25% stated they would request PRS if a patient/caregiver asked, 35% indicated that nothing would prompt them to request PRS. Most respondents (54%) believed psychiatric PRS are currently at least slightly useful and 87% believed they will be so in 5 years. More than 70% indicated they would take action in response to a ch</pubmed_abstract><journal>American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics</journal><pubmed_title>Psychiatric polygenic risk scores: Child and adolescent psychiatrists' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9444963</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R00HG008689</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>3R00HG008689‐05S1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 HD103555</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R00 HG008689</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 MH128676</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01MH128676</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50HD103555</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Soda T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Austin J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Small BJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Torgerson LN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Storch EA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pereira S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lazaro-Munoz G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Munoz KA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sanchez CE</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Psychiatric polygenic risk scores: Child and adolescent psychiatrists' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences.</name><description>Psychiatric polygenic risk scores (PRS) have potential utility in psychiatric care and prevention, but there are concerns about their implementation. We surveyed 960 US-based practicing child and adolescent psychiatrists' (CAP) about their experiences, perspectives, and potential uses of psychiatric PRS. While 23% of CAP reported that they had never heard of PRS, 10 % of respondents have had a patient/family bring PRS to them and 4% have generated PRS for patients. Though 25% stated they would request PRS if a patient/caregiver asked, 35% indicated that nothing would prompt them to request PRS. Most respondents (54%) believed psychiatric PRS are currently at least slightly useful and 87% believed they will be so in 5 years. More than 70% indicated they would take action in response to a ch</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-05T09:42:59.854Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T09:42:59.854Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9444963</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35792502</pubmed><doi>10.1002/ajmg.b.32912</doi></cross_references></HashMap>