<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Bogani G</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>226-234</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9445918</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>162(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Serous endometrial cancer represents a relative rare entity accounting for about 10% of all diagnosed endometrial cancer, but it is responsible for 40% of endometrial cancer-related deaths. Patients with serous endometrial cancer are often diagnosed at earlier disease stage, but remain at higher risk of recurrence and poorer prognosis when compared stage-for-stage with endometrioid subtype endometrial cancer. Serous endometrial cancers are characterized by marked nuclear atypia and abnormal p53 staining in immunohistochemistry. The mainstay of treatment for newly diagnosed serous endometrial cancer includes a multi-modal therapy with surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Unfortunately, despite these efforts, survival outcomes still remain poor. Recently, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)</pubmed_abstract><journal>Gynecologic oncology</journal><pubmed_title>Uterine serous carcinoma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9445918</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 CA016042</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA008748</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Takehara K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Segev Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bogani G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morice P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lopez S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ngoi NYL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raspagliesi F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Enomoto T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vaughan MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Concin N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Takano M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim SI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Panici PB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scambia G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bini M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sagae S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mariani A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leitao MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Monk BJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Candido Dos Reis FJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pignata S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Indini A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lorusso D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Denys H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ray-Coquard I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muzii L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Provencher D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Poka R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wimberger P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Donato V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nout RA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Colombo N</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Uterine serous carcinoma.</name><description>Serous endometrial cancer represents a relative rare entity accounting for about 10% of all diagnosed endometrial cancer, but it is responsible for 40% of endometrial cancer-related deaths. Patients with serous endometrial cancer are often diagnosed at earlier disease stage, but remain at higher risk of recurrence and poorer prognosis when compared stage-for-stage with endometrioid subtype endometrial cancer. Serous endometrial cancers are characterized by marked nuclear atypia and abnormal p53 staining in immunohistochemistry. The mainstay of treatment for newly diagnosed serous endometrial cancer includes a multi-modal therapy with surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Unfortunately, despite these efforts, survival outcomes still remain poor. Recently, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jul</publication><modification>2025-05-29T16:11:38.664Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T09:32:24.998Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9445918</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33934848</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.029</doi></cross_references></HashMap>