<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Botty van den Bruele A</submitter><funding>National Cancer Institute</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>307-315</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9448355</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>189(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>HER2 +- amplified breast cancer patients derive benefit from treatment with anti-HER2-targeted therapy. Though adjuvant treatment is based on final pathology, decisions regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy are made in the preoperative setting with imaging playing a key role in staging. We examined the accuracy of pre-operative imaging in determining pathological tumor size  (pT) in patients undergoing upfront surgery.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Early (cT1-T2N0) HER2 + breast cancer patients who underwent upfront surgery between 2015 and 2016 were identified from a prospective institutional database. We compared data for both clinical and final pathologic stage. Only those who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mammography, and ultrasound in the preoperative setting were included</pubmed_abstract><journal>Breast cancer research and treatment</journal><pubmed_title>Does preoperative MRI accurately stratify early-stage HER2 + breast cancer patients to upfront surgery vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy?</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9448355</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 CA008748</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Hogan MP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fornier MN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Botty van den Bruele A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Javed-Tayyab S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morrow M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sevilimedu V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferraro E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sacchini V</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Does preoperative MRI accurately stratify early-stage HER2 + breast cancer patients to upfront surgery vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy?</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>HER2 +- amplified breast cancer patients derive benefit from treatment with anti-HER2-targeted therapy. Though adjuvant treatment is based on final pathology, decisions regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy are made in the preoperative setting with imaging playing a key role in staging. We examined the accuracy of pre-operative imaging in determining pathological tumor size  (pT) in patients undergoing upfront surgery.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Early (cT1-T2N0) HER2 + breast cancer patients who underwent upfront surgery between 2015 and 2016 were identified from a prospective institutional database. We compared data for both clinical and final pathologic stage. Only those who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mammography, and ultrasound in the preoperative setting were included</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Sep</publication><modification>2025-05-29T16:11:23.199Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T01:48:26.535Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9448355</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34263366</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s10549-021-06331-3</doi></cross_references></HashMap>