<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11(5)</volume><submitter>Lim S</submitter><funding>Sanofi</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>In 2017, a quadrivalent inactivated split-virion influenza vaccine (QIV; Vaxigrip Tetra&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup>, Sanofi) was licensed in South Korea for active immunization against influenza A and influenza B viruses in individuals aged 3 years or older, which was subsequently extended to individuals aged 6 months or older in 2018. Post-marketing surveillance trials are mandatory in South Korea to retain drug licensure. Here, we assessed the safety of QIV in routine clinical practice in South Korea.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This was an open, multicenter, observational, active safety surveillance study conducted between 20 June 2017 and 19 June 2021 at 10 study sites in South Korea in individuals aged 3 years or older who received a single dose of QIV during a routine healthcare visit. The participants or their legally acceptable representatives were instructed to record any adverse reactions (solicited events) and unsolicited non-serious adverse events (AE) in diary cards, and notify study investigators in case of serious adverse events (SAE).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Overall, 663 participants were included in this study. There were no AEs leading to study termination, and no SAEs reported. Injection site pain (278 [41.9%]) was the most frequent solicited injection site reaction, with myalgia (250 [37.7%]) and malaise (236 [35.6%]) the most frequent solicited systemic reactions. Grade 3 solicited injection site and systemic reactions were reported by 8 (1.2%) and 13 (2.0%) participants, respectively; most participants with solicited reactions recovered without the need for further action. Overall, 39 (5.9%) participants experienced 49 unsolicited non-serious AEs with the most frequently reported being nasopharyngitis (19 [2.9%]). Grade 3 unsolicited non-serious adverse events were reported in 1 (0.2%) participant. None of the unsolicited non-serious AEs were considered to be related to QIV.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>This post-marketing surveillance study confirms that QIV is well tolerated and has an acceptable safety profile in routine practice in South Korea. No unexpected safety concerns were identified.&lt;h4>Trial registration&lt;/h4>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05406180.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Infectious diseases and therapy</journal><pagination>2035-2043</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9450834</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Post-marketing Surveillance of a Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (Vaxigrip Tetra) in South Korea.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9450834</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Li X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lim S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fournier M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Syrkina O</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Post-marketing Surveillance of a Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (Vaxigrip Tetra) in South Korea.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>In 2017, a quadrivalent inactivated split-virion influenza vaccine (QIV; Vaxigrip Tetra&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup>, Sanofi) was licensed in South Korea for active immunization against influenza A and influenza B viruses in individuals aged 3 years or older, which was subsequently extended to individuals aged 6 months or older in 2018. Post-marketing surveillance trials are mandatory in South Korea to retain drug licensure. Here, we assessed the safety of QIV in routine clinical practice in South Korea.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This was an open, multicenter, observational, active safety surveillance study conducted between 20 June 2017 and 19 June 2021 at 10 study sites in South Korea in individuals aged 3 years or older who received a single dose of QIV during a routine healthcare visit. The participants or their legally acceptable representatives were instructed to record any adverse reactions (solicited events) and unsolicited non-serious adverse events (AE) in diary cards, and notify study investigators in case of serious adverse events (SAE).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Overall, 663 participants were included in this study. There were no AEs leading to study termination, and no SAEs reported. Injection site pain (278 [41.9%]) was the most frequent solicited injection site reaction, with myalgia (250 [37.7%]) and malaise (236 [35.6%]) the most frequent solicited systemic reactions. Grade 3 solicited injection site and systemic reactions were reported by 8 (1.2%) and 13 (2.0%) participants, respectively; most participants with solicited reactions recovered without the need for further action. Overall, 39 (5.9%) participants experienced 49 unsolicited non-serious AEs with the most frequently reported being nasopharyngitis (19 [2.9%]). Grade 3 unsolicited non-serious adverse events were reported in 1 (0.2%) participant. None of the unsolicited non-serious AEs were considered to be related to QIV.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>This post-marketing surveillance study confirms that QIV is well tolerated and has an acceptable safety profile in routine practice in South Korea. No unexpected safety concerns were identified.&lt;h4>Trial registration&lt;/h4>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05406180.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2024-11-06T07:25:47.239Z</modification><creation>2024-11-06T07:25:47.239Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9450834</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36070176</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s40121-022-00685-x</doi></cross_references></HashMap>