<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(5)</volume><submitter>Han JH</submitter><funding>Soonchunhyang University</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background/aims&lt;/h4>The adenoma detection rate (ADR) does not reflect the complete detection of every adenoma during colonoscopy; thus, many surrogate indicators have been suggested. This study investigated whether the ADR and surrogate quality indicators reflect the adenoma miss rate (AMR) when performing qualified colonoscopy.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study of asymptomatic examinees aged 50 to 75 years who underwent back-to-back screening colonoscopies by eight endoscopists. The ADR and surrogate quality indicators, including polyp detection rate, total number of adenomas per colonoscopy, additional adenomas found after the first adenoma per colonoscopy (ADR-Plus), and total number of adenomas per positive participant, were calculated fo</pubmed_abstract><journal>Gut and liver</journal><pagination>716-725</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9474487</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9474487</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Jeon SR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cho YS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim HG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shin HD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahn EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shin JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jung Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kwak MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cha JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Han JH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background/aims&lt;/h4>The adenoma detection rate (ADR) does not reflect the complete detection of every adenoma during colonoscopy; thus, many surrogate indicators have been suggested. This study investigated whether the ADR and surrogate quality indicators reflect the adenoma miss rate (AMR) when performing qualified colonoscopy.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study of asymptomatic examinees aged 50 to 75 years who underwent back-to-back screening colonoscopies by eight endoscopists. The ADR and surrogate quality indicators, including polyp detection rate, total number of adenomas per colonoscopy, additional adenomas found after the first adenoma per colonoscopy (ADR-Plus), and total number of adenomas per positive participant, were calculated fo</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Sep</publication><modification>2025-05-29T16:11:51.351Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T09:32:12.243Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9474487</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34933279</pubmed><doi>10.5009/gnl210287</doi></cross_references></HashMap>