<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12</volume><submitter>Galactionova K</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who have residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) are at a high risk of relapse. PENELOPE-B was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial that investigated adding palbociclib (PAL) for thirteen 28-day cycles to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in these patients. Clinical results showed no significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival with PAL.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a pre-planned cost-effectiveness analysis of PAL within PENELOPE-B from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. Health-related quality of life scores, collected in the trial using the EQ-5D-3L instrument, were converted to utilities based on the German valuation algorithm. Re</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in oncology</journal><pagination>886831</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9484462</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Cost-effectiveness of palbociclib in early breast cancer patients with a high risk of relapse: Results from the PENELOPE-B trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9484462</pmcid><pubmed_authors>McCarthy N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marme F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Makris A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rugo HS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bonnefoi HR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Toi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schwenkglenks M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kelly CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reimer T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia-Saenz JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Burchardi N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim SB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bear HD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gnant M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gelmon KA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loibl S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Untch M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martin M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galactionova K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salari P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Cost-effectiveness of palbociclib in early breast cancer patients with a high risk of relapse: Results from the PENELOPE-B trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who have residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) are at a high risk of relapse. PENELOPE-B was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial that investigated adding palbociclib (PAL) for thirteen 28-day cycles to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in these patients. Clinical results showed no significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival with PAL.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a pre-planned cost-effectiveness analysis of PAL within PENELOPE-B from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. Health-related quality of life scores, collected in the trial using the EQ-5D-3L instrument, were converted to utilities based on the German valuation algorithm. Re</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-18T22:23:59.742Z</modification><creation>2024-11-09T20:50:54.882Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9484462</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36132153</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fonc.2022.886831</doi></cross_references></HashMap>