<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11(5)</volume><submitter>Ikeda M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>With the advent of effective systemic therapy, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is established as a highly effective locoregional treatment modality for carefully selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This randomized controlled trial was conducted to clarify whether selective TACE with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) loaded with epirubicin or selective conventional TACE (cTACE) with epirubicin-ethiodized oil might be more effective for obtaining complete response(CR) in patients with HCC.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between March 2016 and May 2019, Child-Pugh class A or B patients with unresectable HCC who were scheduled to receive selective TACE were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the DEB-TACE arm or the cTACE arm. The primary endpoint was the CR rate at </pubmed_abstract><journal>Liver cancer</journal><pagination>440-450</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9485929</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Conventional or Drug-Eluting Beads? Randomized Controlled Study of Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: JIVROSG-1302.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9485929</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Sugawara S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tsukahara Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tsurusaki M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kobayashi T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Azama K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arai Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morita S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sugihara E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sone M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kamimura K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Inaba Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kodama Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ikeda M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tanaka T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sato M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anai H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Seki H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aramaki T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miyazaki M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Conventional or Drug-Eluting Beads? Randomized Controlled Study of Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: JIVROSG-1302.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>With the advent of effective systemic therapy, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is established as a highly effective locoregional treatment modality for carefully selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This randomized controlled trial was conducted to clarify whether selective TACE with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) loaded with epirubicin or selective conventional TACE (cTACE) with epirubicin-ethiodized oil might be more effective for obtaining complete response(CR) in patients with HCC.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between March 2016 and May 2019, Child-Pugh class A or B patients with unresectable HCC who were scheduled to receive selective TACE were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the DEB-TACE arm or the cTACE arm. The primary endpoint was the CR rate at </description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-04T21:34:59.062Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T21:34:59.062Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9485929</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36158586</pubmed><doi>10.1159/000525500</doi></cross_references></HashMap>