<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Moes-Sosnowska J</submitter><funding>Celon Pharma S.A.</funding><funding>National Center of Research and Development and pharmaceutical company Celon Pharma S.A.</funding><funding>National Center of Research and Development</funding><pagination>10506</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9505002</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>23(18)</volume><pubmed_abstract>While fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are involved in several biological pathways and FGFR inhibitors may be useful in the treatment of squamous non-small cell lung cancer (Sq-NSCLC), FGFR aberrations are not well characterized in Sq-NSCLC. We comprehensively evaluated FGFR expression, fusions, and variants in 40 fresh-frozen primary Sq-NSCLC (stage IA3−IV) samples and tumor-adjacent normal tissues using real-time PCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Protein expression of FGFR1−3 and amplification of FGFR1 were also analyzed. FGFR1 and FGFR4 median gene expression was significantly (p &lt; 0.001) decreased in tumors compared with normal tissue. Increased FGFR3 expression enhanced the recurrence risk (hazard ratio 4.72, p = 0.029), while high FGFR4 expression was associated with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.036). Enhanced FGFR1 gene expression was correlated with FGFR1 protein overexpression (r = 0.75, p = 0.0003), but not with FGFR1 amplification. NGS revealed known pathogenic FGFR2,3 variants, an FGFR3::TACC3 fusion, and a novel TACC1::FGFR1 fusion together with FGFR1,2 variants of uncertain significance not previously reported in Sq-NSCLC. These findings expand our knowledge of the Sq-NSCLC molecular background and show that combining different methods increases the rate of FGFR aberrations detection, which may improve patient selection for FGFRi treatment.</pubmed_abstract><journal>International journal of molecular sciences</journal><pubmed_title>FGFR1-4 RNA-Based Gene Alteration and Expression Analysis in Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9505002</pmcid><funding_grant_id>STRATEGMED2/266776/17/NCBR/2015</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>project &amp;quot;CELONKO&amp;quot; (STRATEGMED2 /266776/17/NCBR/2015)</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Popiel D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wieczorek M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lechowicz U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rudzinski P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Szczepulska-Wojcik E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Skupinska M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stepniewska A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Langfort R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moes-Sosnowska J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stanczak A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chorostowska-Wynimko J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Orlowski T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Skronska P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rozy A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>FGFR1-4 RNA-Based Gene Alteration and Expression Analysis in Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.</name><description>While fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are involved in several biological pathways and FGFR inhibitors may be useful in the treatment of squamous non-small cell lung cancer (Sq-NSCLC), FGFR aberrations are not well characterized in Sq-NSCLC. We comprehensively evaluated FGFR expression, fusions, and variants in 40 fresh-frozen primary Sq-NSCLC (stage IA3−IV) samples and tumor-adjacent normal tissues using real-time PCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Protein expression of FGFR1−3 and amplification of FGFR1 were also analyzed. FGFR1 and FGFR4 median gene expression was significantly (p &lt; 0.001) decreased in tumors compared with normal tissue. Increased FGFR3 expression enhanced the recurrence risk (hazard ratio 4.72, p = 0.029), while high FGFR4 expression was associated with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.036). Enhanced FGFR1 gene expression was correlated with FGFR1 protein overexpression (r = 0.75, p = 0.0003), but not with FGFR1 amplification. NGS revealed known pathogenic FGFR2,3 variants, an FGFR3::TACC3 fusion, and a novel TACC1::FGFR1 fusion together with FGFR1,2 variants of uncertain significance not previously reported in Sq-NSCLC. These findings expand our knowledge of the Sq-NSCLC molecular background and show that combining different methods increases the rate of FGFR aberrations detection, which may improve patient selection for FGFRi treatment.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Sep</publication><modification>2026-04-08T11:49:25.917Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T00:43:49.762Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9505002</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36142417</pubmed><doi>10.3390/ijms231810506</doi></cross_references></HashMap>