{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Charman SJ"],"funding":["National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)","National Institute for Health and Care Research","NIHR School for Primary Care Research"],"pagination":["805-812"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9508869"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["39(5)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Diagnostic tools available to support general practitioners diagnose heart failure (HF) are limited.<h4>Objectives</h4>(i) Determine the feasibility of the novel cardiac output response to stress (CORS) test in suspected HF patients, and (ii) Identify differences in the CORS results between (a) confirmed HF patients from non-HF patients, and (b) HF reduced (HFrEF) vs HF preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction.<h4>Methods</h4>Single centre, prospective, observational, feasibility study. Consecutive patients with suspected HF (N = 105; mean age: 72 ± 10 years) were recruited from specialized HF diagnostic clinics in secondary care. The consultant cardiologist confirmed or refuted a HF diagnosis. The patient completed the CORS but the researcher administering the test was blind"],"journal":["Family practice"],"pubmed_title":["Feasibility of the cardiac output response to stress test in suspected heart failure patients."],"pmcid":["PMC9508869"],"funding_grant_id":["NIHR200287","NF-SI-0611-10273","CL-2015-13-006"],"pubmed_authors":["Coats AJS","Okwose NC","Hobbs FDR","Mant J","Ristic A","Taylor CJ","Fuat A","Charman SJ","Deaton C","MacGowan GA","Jakovljevic DG","Bailey K","Seferovic PM"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Feasibility of the cardiac output response to stress test in suspected heart failure patients.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Diagnostic tools available to support general practitioners diagnose heart failure (HF) are limited.<h4>Objectives</h4>(i) Determine the feasibility of the novel cardiac output response to stress (CORS) test in suspected HF patients, and (ii) Identify differences in the CORS results between (a) confirmed HF patients from non-HF patients, and (b) HF reduced (HFrEF) vs HF preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction.<h4>Methods</h4>Single centre, prospective, observational, feasibility study. Consecutive patients with suspected HF (N = 105; mean age: 72 ± 10 years) were recruited from specialized HF diagnostic clinics in secondary care. The consultant cardiologist confirmed or refuted a HF diagnosis. The patient completed the CORS but the researcher administering the test was blind","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Sep","modification":"2025-07-25T03:08:01.431Z","creation":"2025-04-07T09:01:50.436Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9508869","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35083480"],"doi":["10.1093/fampra/cmab184"]}}