{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Evans K"],"funding":["Medical Research Council"],"pagination":["e061330"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9528679"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["12(9)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Introduction</h4>Methodologically robust clinical trials are required to improve neonatal care and reduce unwanted variations in practice. Previous neonatal research prioritisation processes have identified important research themes rather than specific research questions amenable to clinical trials. Practice-changing trials require well-defined research questions, commonly organised using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) structure. By narrowing the scope of research priorities to those which can be answered in clinical trials and by involving a wide range of different stakeholders, we aim to provide a robust and transparent process to identify and prioritise research questions answerable within the National Healthcare System to inform future practice-changing c"],"journal":["BMJ open"],"pubmed_title":["National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom."],"pmcid":["PMC9528679"],"funding_grant_id":["MR/V036866/1"],"pubmed_authors":["Mactier H","Hardy P","Gallagher K","Gale C","Boardman JP","Webbe J","Johnston E","Evans K","Battersby C","Boyle EM","Dorling J","Marcroft C","Carroll WD","Dinwiddy K"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom.","description":"<h4>Introduction</h4>Methodologically robust clinical trials are required to improve neonatal care and reduce unwanted variations in practice. Previous neonatal research prioritisation processes have identified important research themes rather than specific research questions amenable to clinical trials. Practice-changing trials require well-defined research questions, commonly organised using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) structure. By narrowing the scope of research priorities to those which can be answered in clinical trials and by involving a wide range of different stakeholders, we aim to provide a robust and transparent process to identify and prioritise research questions answerable within the National Healthcare System to inform future practice-changing c","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Sep","modification":"2025-04-19T11:30:20.279Z","creation":"2025-04-19T11:30:20.279Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9528679","cross_references":{"pubmed":["36171048"],"doi":["10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061330"]}}