<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>2022</volume><submitter>Liu L</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>This study used machine learning methods to develop a prediction model for knee pain in middle-aged and elderly individuals.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A total of 5386 individuals above 45 years old were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Participants were randomly divided into a training set and a test set at a 7 : 3 ratio. The training set was used to create a prediction model, whereas the test set was used to validate the proposed model. We constructed multiple predictive models based on three machine learning methods: logistic regression, random forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. The model performance was evaluated by areas under the receiver (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Additionally, we </pubmed_abstract><journal>Computational and mathematical methods in medicine</journal><pagination>5005195</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9529423</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Predictive Models for Knee Pain in Middle-Aged and Elderly Individuals Based on Machine Learning Methods.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9529423</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Liu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cai LL</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Predictive Models for Knee Pain in Middle-Aged and Elderly Individuals Based on Machine Learning Methods.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>This study used machine learning methods to develop a prediction model for knee pain in middle-aged and elderly individuals.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A total of 5386 individuals above 45 years old were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Participants were randomly divided into a training set and a test set at a 7 : 3 ratio. The training set was used to create a prediction model, whereas the test set was used to validate the proposed model. We constructed multiple predictive models based on three machine learning methods: logistic regression, random forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. The model performance was evaluated by areas under the receiver (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Additionally, we </description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-19T10:01:38.446Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T10:01:38.446Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9529423</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36199766</pubmed><doi>10.1155/2022/5005195</doi></cross_references></HashMap>