<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>8(1)</volume><submitter>Nosheny RL</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Efficient identification of cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk in early stages of the AD disease continuum is a critical unmet need. Subjective cognitive decline is increasingly recognized as an early symptomatic stage of AD. Dyadic cognitive report, including subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) from a participant and an informant/study partner who knows the participant well, represents an accurate, reliable, and efficient source of data for assessing risk. However, the separate and combined contributions of self- and study partner report, and the dynamic relationship between the two, remains unclear. The Subjective Cognitive Decline Professional Interest Area within the Alzheimer's Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment convened </pubmed_abstract><journal>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia (New York, N. Y.)</journal><pagination>e12357</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9530696</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The role of dyadic cognitive report and subjective cognitive decline in early ADRD clinical research and trials: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9530696</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Sanchez-Benavides G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dyadic Patterns of Subjective Report working group within the Subjective Cognitive Decline Professional Interest Area, Alzheimer's Association ISTAART</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sellek Rodriguez AF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuhn E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aaronson A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zawaly K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Urwyler P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pereiro AX</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brucki SMD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kasuga K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ismail Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sikkes SAM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Amariglio R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dowling NM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nosheny RL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moretti DV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bicalho MAC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van Hulle C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Numbers K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The role of dyadic cognitive report and subjective cognitive decline in early ADRD clinical research and trials: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations.</name><description>Efficient identification of cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk in early stages of the AD disease continuum is a critical unmet need. Subjective cognitive decline is increasingly recognized as an early symptomatic stage of AD. Dyadic cognitive report, including subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) from a participant and an informant/study partner who knows the participant well, represents an accurate, reliable, and efficient source of data for assessing risk. However, the separate and combined contributions of self- and study partner report, and the dynamic relationship between the two, remains unclear. The Subjective Cognitive Decline Professional Interest Area within the Alzheimer's Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment convened </description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-05T12:18:39.338Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T12:18:39.338Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9530696</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36226046</pubmed><doi>10.1002/trc2.12357</doi></cross_references></HashMap>