<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>22(1)</volume><submitter>Pan Y</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Despite the widespread use of the single item self-rated health (SRH) question, its reliability has never been evaluated in Chinese population.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We used data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, waves 1-4 (2011-2019). In wave 1, the same SRH question was asked twice, separated by other questions, on a subset of 4533 subjects, allowing us to examine the test-retest reliability of SRH. In addition, two versions of SRH questions (the WHO and US versions) were asked (n = 11,429). Kappa (κ), weighted kappa ([Formula: see text]), and polychoric correlation coefficient (ρ) were used for reliability assessment. Cox proportional-hazards models were estimated to assess the predictive validity of SRH measurement for mortality over 7 years of follow</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC public health</journal><pagination>1863</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9536015</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Reliability and predictive validity of two scales of self-rated health in China: results from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9536015</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Pan Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pikhart H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pikhartova J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bobak M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Reliability and predictive validity of two scales of self-rated health in China: results from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Despite the widespread use of the single item self-rated health (SRH) question, its reliability has never been evaluated in Chinese population.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We used data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, waves 1-4 (2011-2019). In wave 1, the same SRH question was asked twice, separated by other questions, on a subset of 4533 subjects, allowing us to examine the test-retest reliability of SRH. In addition, two versions of SRH questions (the WHO and US versions) were asked (n = 11,429). Kappa (κ), weighted kappa ([Formula: see text]), and polychoric correlation coefficient (ρ) were used for reliability assessment. Cox proportional-hazards models were estimated to assess the predictive validity of SRH measurement for mortality over 7 years of follow</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-04T08:44:48.82Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T00:27:53.363Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9536015</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36199057</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12889-022-14218-1</doi></cross_references></HashMap>