{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Cushley S"],"funding":["HSC R&D Division, Public Health Agency"],"pagination":["891-909"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9545459"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["55(9)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>A large number of research reports on vital pulp treatment (VPT) has been published over the last two decades. However, heterogeneity in reporting outcomes of VPT is a significant challenge for evidence synthesis and clinical decision-making.<h4>Objectives</h4>To identify outcomes assessed in VPT studies and to evaluate how and when outcomes are measured. A subsidiary aim was to assess evidence for selective reporting bias in the included studies. The results of this review will be used to inform the development of a core outcome set (COS) for endodontic treatments.<h4>Methods</h4>Multiple healthcare bibliographic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Web of Science were searched for systematic reviews publi"],"journal":["International endodontic journal"],"pubmed_title":["Outcomes reporting in systematic reviews on vital pulp treatment: A scoping review for the development of a core outcome set."],"pmcid":["PMC9545459"],"funding_grant_id":["EAT/5579/19"],"pubmed_authors":["El Karim I","Cushley S","Lundy FT","Duncan HF","Nagendrababu V","Clarke M"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Outcomes reporting in systematic reviews on vital pulp treatment: A scoping review for the development of a core outcome set.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>A large number of research reports on vital pulp treatment (VPT) has been published over the last two decades. However, heterogeneity in reporting outcomes of VPT is a significant challenge for evidence synthesis and clinical decision-making.<h4>Objectives</h4>To identify outcomes assessed in VPT studies and to evaluate how and when outcomes are measured. A subsidiary aim was to assess evidence for selective reporting bias in the included studies. The results of this review will be used to inform the development of a core outcome set (COS) for endodontic treatments.<h4>Methods</h4>Multiple healthcare bibliographic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Web of Science were searched for systematic reviews publi","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Sep","modification":"2025-04-19T04:47:51.577Z","creation":"2025-04-19T04:47:51.577Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9545459","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35704241"],"doi":["10.1111/iej.13785"]}}