<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>88(9)</volume><submitter>Foreman E</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>The aim of this study is to investigate the rates of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) in patients receiving paclitaxel chemotherapy, with and without a histamine-2 (H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> ) antagonists.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>This prospective, multi-centre, cohort study compared patients receiving paclitaxel treated with premedication regimens containing chlorphenamine, dexamethasone and an H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonist vs patients treated without an H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonist. Rates of HSRs were described and logistic multivariable regression was used to investigate any associations with H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonist treatment, adjusting for confounding variables.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 1043 individuals were included in the study; of these, 638 (61%) patients received an H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonist and 405 (49%) were not given an H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonist. Incidence of HSR in the cohort treated with H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonists was 11.31% (n = 70) vs 9.86% (n = 41) in the cohort without. There was no statistically significant difference between the rates of HSR observed in those receiving and not receiving an H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonist (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.65, 1.66, P = .9).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Results presented within the study are consistent with other recently published evidence to suggest that H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonists do not confer any advantage as part of premedication regimens in reducing the incidence of HSR in patients treated with paclitaxel.</pubmed_abstract><journal>British journal of clinical pharmacology</journal><pagination>4191-4198</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9545865</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Histamine-2 (H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> ) antagonists can be safely removed from standard paclitaxel premedication regimens.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9545865</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Foreman E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walker A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chambers P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Polwart C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Histamine-2 (H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> ) antagonists can be safely removed from standard paclitaxel premedication regimens.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>The aim of this study is to investigate the rates of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) in patients receiving paclitaxel chemotherapy, with and without a histamine-2 (H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> ) antagonists.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>This prospective, multi-centre, cohort study compared patients receiving paclitaxel treated with premedication regimens containing chlorphenamine, dexamethasone and an H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonist vs patients treated without an H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonist. Rates of HSRs were described and logistic multivariable regression was used to investigate any associations with H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonist treatment, adjusting for confounding variables.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 1043 individuals were included in the study; of these, 638 (61%) patients received an H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonist and 405 (49%) were not given an H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonist. Incidence of HSR in the cohort treated with H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonists was 11.31% (n = 70) vs 9.86% (n = 41) in the cohort without. There was no statistically significant difference between the rates of HSR observed in those receiving and not receiving an H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonist (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.65, 1.66, P = .9).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Results presented within the study are consistent with other recently published evidence to suggest that H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> antagonists do not confer any advantage as part of premedication regimens in reducing the incidence of HSR in patients treated with paclitaxel.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-22T01:58:21.197Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T20:11:06.839Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9545865</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35470452</pubmed><doi>10.1111/bcp.15363</doi></cross_references></HashMap>