<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>128(19)</volume><submitter>Bargon CA</submitter><funding>St. Antonius Ziekenhuis</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Oncological safety of different types and timings of PMBR after breast cancer remains controversial. Lack of stratified risk assessment in literature makes current clinical and shared decision-making complex. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate differences in oncological outcomes after immediate versus delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) for autologous and implant-based PMBR separately.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The Cochrane Collaboration Handbook and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist were followed for data abstraction. Variability in point estimates attributable to heterogeneity was assessed using I&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> -statist</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cancer</journal><pagination>3449-3469</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9546326</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Breast cancer recurrence after immediate and delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9546326</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ikinci M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Braakenburg A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Doeksen A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bargon CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Young-Afat DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rakhorst HA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mureau MAM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Verkooijen HM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Breast cancer recurrence after immediate and delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Oncological safety of different types and timings of PMBR after breast cancer remains controversial. Lack of stratified risk assessment in literature makes current clinical and shared decision-making complex. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate differences in oncological outcomes after immediate versus delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) for autologous and implant-based PMBR separately.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The Cochrane Collaboration Handbook and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist were followed for data abstraction. Variability in point estimates attributable to heterogeneity was assessed using I&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> -statist</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-22T01:51:43.005Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T20:09:59.604Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9546326</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35894936</pubmed><doi>10.1002/cncr.34393</doi></cross_references></HashMap>